Abstract:Even once children can accurately remember their experiences, they nevertheless struggle to use those memories in flexible new ways-as in when drawing inferences. However, it remains an open question as to whether the developmental differences observed during both memory formation and inference itself represent a fundamental limitation on children's learning mechanisms, or rather their deployment of suboptimal strategy. Here, 7-9-year-old children (N = 154) and young adults (N = 130) first formed strong memories for initial (AB) associations and then engaged in one of three learning strategies as they viewed overlapping (BC) pairs. We found that being told to integrate-combine ABC during learning-both significantly improved children's ability to explicitly relate the indirectly associated A and C items during inference and protected the underlying pair memories from forgetting. However, this finding contrasted with implicit evidence for memory-to-memory connections: Adults and children both formed A-C links prior to any knowledge of an inference test-yet for children, such links were most apparent when they were told to simply encode BC, not integrate. Moreover, the accessibility of such implicit links differed between children and adults, with adults using them to make explicit inferences but children only doing so for well-established direct AB pairs. These results suggest that while a lack of integration strategy may explain a large share of the developmental differences in explicit inference, children and adults nevertheless differ in both the circumstances under which they connect interrelated memories and their ability to later leverage those links to inform flexible behaviours. RESEARCH HIGHLIGHTS: Children and adults view AB and BC pairs related through a shared item, B. This provides an opportunity for learners to connect A-C in memory. Being encouraged to integrate ABC during learning boosted performance on an explicit test of A-C connections (children and adults) and protected from forgetting (children). Children and adults differed in when implicit A-C connections were formed-occurring primarily when told to separately encode BC (children) versus integrate (adults), respectively. Adults used implicit A-C connections to facilitate explicit judgments, while children did not. Our results suggest developmental differences in the learning conditions promoting memory-to-memory connections.

Aha! and D'oh! experiences enhance learning for incidental information—new evidence supports the insight memory advantage

The Aha! moment: Is insight a different form of problem solving?

Surprise!-Clarifying the link between insight and prediction error

The Aha! experience is associated with a drop in the perceived difficulty of the problem

Getting a grip on insight: real-time and embodied Aha experiences predict correct solutions

Aha! under pressure: The Aha! experience is not constrained by cognitive load

Markers of Insight

Neural Mechanisms of Creative Problem Solving: From Representational Change to Memory Formation

States of epistemic curiosity interfere with memory for incidental scholastic facts

Zeigarnik effect in Insight problem solving: Hemi-spheric difference in brain activities following problem solving and during hint presentation

The lack of Aha! experience can be dependent on the problem difficulty

Insight solutions are correct more often than analytic solutions

Resting state and task-related brain dynamics supporting insight

Neural Correlates of the “aha” Experiences: Evidence from an Fmri Study of Insight Problem Solving

Imagining is not seeing: lower insight-driven memory reconfiguration when imagining the link between separate events

Learning how to exploit sources of information

Insight and non-insight problem solving: A heart rate variability study

Young children's understanding and experience of insight

Learning strategy differentially impacts memory connections in children and adults

Changes in semantic memory structure support successful problem-solving and analogical transfer

Spontaneous associative thought may facilitate scene-gist memory via implicit scene-labeling