Sparsentan is superior to losartan in the gddY mouse model of IgA nephropathy

Hajime Nagasawa,Seiji Ueda,Hitoshi Suzuki,Celia Jenkinson,Yusuke Fukao,Maiko Nakayama,Tomoyuki Otsuka,Teruyuki Okuma,Wilmelenne Clapper,Kai Liu,Mai Nguyen,Radko Komers,Yusuke Suzuki
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ndt/gfae021
IF: 7.1857
2024-01-25
Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation
Abstract:Abstract Background The mechanism leading to the development of IgA nephropathy (IgAN) remains to be completely understood. Endothelin-1 (ET-1) as well as angiotensin II (AngII) promote glomerular injury, tubulointerstitial inflammation, and fibrosis leading to chronic kidney disease. Sparsentan, a dual endothelin angiotensin receptor antagonist (DEARA), recently received accelerated approval in United States for the reduction of proteinuria in adults with IgAN at high risk of disease progression. To elucidate the mechanisms by which sparsentan is efficacious in IgAN, we examined the effect of treatment in gddY mice, a spontaneous IgAN mouse model, versus the monoselective angiotensin II type 1 receptor (AT1R) antagonist, losartan, on the development of renal injury at doses resulting in similar blood pressure lowering. Methods Four-week-old gddY mice were given control chow, chow containing sparsentan, or drinking water containing losartan until 12 or 20 weeks old. Results Remarkably, the albumin:creatine ratio (ACR) was attenuated more rapidly and to a greater extent in mice treated with sparsentan than those treated with losartan. The decrease in ACR from baseline after 4 weeks of treatment correlated with beneficial effects of sparsentan on glomerulosclerosis and protection of podocytes and glycocalyx after 16 weeks of treatment across treatment groups; thus, sparsentan treatment delayed development of renal injury to a greater extent than losartan. Expression of mRNA for ET-1, ETAR, and AT1R and proinflammatory genes was upregulated in 12-week-old gddY mice and was prevented by sparsentan and losartan to a comparable extent. Conclusions The results of this study, and in light of the results of the phase 3 PROTECT trial, provide a novel perspective and understanding of the mechanisms by which sparsentan has a beneficial renoprotective effect against IgAN compared to AT1R antagonism alone.
urology & nephrology,transplantation
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
### Problems the paper attempts to solve This paper aims to explore the therapeutic effect of Sparsentan in IgA nephropathy (IgAN) and its mechanism. Specifically, by comparing the efficacy of Sparsentan and Losartan in the gddY mouse model, the researchers attempted to answer the following questions: 1. **Is Sparsentan more effective than Losartan in slowing the progression of IgAN?** - The researchers hoped to verify whether Sparsentan could reduce the urinary albumin - to - creatinine ratio (ACR) more rapidly and significantly and better protect the kidneys from damage. 2. **What is the mechanism of action of Sparsentan?** - By comparing the effects of Sparsentan and Losartan on the endothelin system, AngII system, and the expression of inflammation and fibrosis genes, the researchers attempted to reveal the specific mechanism by which Sparsentan provides better efficacy in IgAN. 3. **What are the effects of Sparsentan on glomerulosclerosis, podocyte injury, and glycocalyx loss?** - The researchers hoped to evaluate through histological analysis whether Sparsentan could better prevent these pathological changes. ### Background information IgA nephropathy (IgAN) is a common primary glomerulonephritis characterized by IgA deposition in the glomerular mesangial area. Although there are currently some treatment methods, there is no specific drug that can completely stop the progression of the disease. Sparsentan, as a dual endothelin - AngII receptor antagonist, has shown good anti - proteinuria effects in clinical trials and has obtained accelerated approval from the US FDA for the treatment of high - risk IgAN patients. However, its specific renal protection mechanism still needs further study. ### Method overview The researchers used a spontaneous IgAN mouse model (gddY mice). Mice at 4 weeks of age were divided into several groups and given a control diet, a diet containing Sparsentan, or drinking water containing Losartan, which lasted until 12 weeks or 20 weeks of age. The effects of the two drugs were evaluated by monitoring the urinary albumin - to - creatinine ratio (ACR), blood pressure, renal function indicators, and changes in histology and gene expression. ### Main findings - **Reduction of ACR**: Sparsentan reduced ACR more rapidly and significantly than Losartan. - **Prevention of glomerulosclerosis**: Sparsentan significantly reduced glomerulosclerosis, while Losartan had a weaker effect. - **Protection of podocytes and glycocalyx**: Sparsentan better protected podocytes and glycocalyx from damage. - **Changes in gene expression**: Both Sparsentan and Losartan could inhibit the up - regulation of ET - 1, ETA receptor, and AT1 receptor mRNA, but Sparsentan was more effective. ### Conclusion The research results show that Sparsentan exhibits better renal protection than Losartan in the IgAN mouse model, which may be due to its simultaneous blockade of the endothelin and AngII systems, thereby more effectively reducing renal injury and inflammatory reactions. These findings provide a new perspective for understanding the mechanism of action of Sparsentan in IgAN and suggest that it may become a more effective treatment option.