Ionosphere Spatial Gradient Threat for LAAS: Mitigation and Tolerable Threat Space
Ming Luo,Sam Pullen,Todd Walter,Per Enge
2004-01-01
Abstract:The ionosphere spatial gradients under extreme conditions are likely to influence the LAAS architecture, particularly for Category II/III precision approach and landing systems. In previous study, a .moving wave front. model was established and a threat space was extrapolated based on the 6 April 2000 ionospheric storm. It was showed that the impact of the ionospheric anomalies depends on the threat parameters, namely, the ionospheric gradient, the slope width, and the wave front speed. Under a typical 24-satellite constellation, the maximum user vertical error at 5 km of user-to-LGF separation can reach as high as 20 meters in the worst case. However, with prompt detection of LAAS Ground Facility (LGF), the maximum user vertical position error can be mitigated to under 6 meters. Airborne monitor can further reduce the error especially when the ionospheric wave front moves fast. Although those work provided essential insights, due to the limited data available thus far and the uncertainty of the ionospheric storm behavior, many important questions remain unanswered: The prior probability of such extreme event, the conservativeness of the threat space, the creditability of the .moving wave front. model, etc. In this study, the analysis was extended to less-ideal constellations, i.e, with one or two satellites outages. In addition to the .moving wave front. model, the focus was shifted to .stationary front. scenarios, which means that the ionospheric front stops moving prior to reaching the LGF. The impact of such scenarios is worse since LGF could not detect such an event by definition. It was found that the worst user error could reach 45 meters under extreme conditions. Although an airborne monitor can help to reduce the error significantly, the remaining maximum error can still be as high as 31 meters. While more data analysis effort are undergoing in order to refine the threat model, a parallel approach was undertaken to identify the system design vulnerability, i.e., to define a sub threat space that is tolerable for LAAS. It was found that under worst conditions, ionospheric stationary fronts with a slope of 70 mm/km or higher is not tolerable. The current airborne monitor does not help on increasing the tolerable threat space. Although LGF and airborne detection are extremely important, the current architecture may not be able to meet LAAS requirements [3, 11, 12] under worst-case ionosphere conditions. Two means are examined for ionospheric threat mitigation: .Inner Satellites Protection. and Long Baseline Monitor (LBM). The effeteness of the outer satellites to protect the inner satellites is very limited particularly with fewer satellites in view. On other words, the inner satellites remain vulnerable for those worst cases. LBM is able to fully mitigate the problem for the entire threat space. The optimum LBM separation was recommended for consideration.