Development of an accelerometer‐based wearable sensor approach for alcohol consumption detection

Nicholas J. Bush,Adriana K. Cushnie,Madison Sinclair,Huda Ahmed,Rachel Schorn,Tongzhen Xie,Jeff Boissoneault
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/acer.15465
2024-10-16
Alcoholism Clinical and Experimental Research
Abstract:Our study develops and validates a novel framework for detecting and analyzing drinking behavior using smartwatch sensors. We compared a distributional and machine learning algorithm and found that both performed effectively in identifying sips and analyzing drinking patterns comparable to manual coding without extensive data preprocessing. However, the distributional algorithm was less sensitive to differences in container shape. This methodology can potentially assist with experimental alcohol topography research and be integrated with mobile interventions. Background Alcohol is a commonly used substance associated with significant public health consequences. Treatment is often stigmatized and limited with regard to both access and affordability, demonstrating the need for innovations in alcohol treatment. Accelerometer sensors can detect drinking without user input and are widely incorporated into wearable devices, increasing accessibility and affordability. Methods We compared a distributional and random forest classification approach to detect and evaluate sensor‐based drinking data. Data were collected at a local state fair (n = 194), where participants drank water at specified intervals interspersed with confounding behaviors (e.g., touching nose, rubbing forehead, or yawning) while wearing an Android‐based smartwatch for 10 min. Participants were randomized to receive one of three drinking container shapes: pint, martini, or wine. Results The random forest model achieved an overall testing accuracy of 93% (sensitivity = 0.32; specificity = 0.99; positive predictive value = 0.74). The distributional algorithm achieved an overall accuracy of 95% (sensitivity = 0.76; specificity = 0.97; positive predictive value = 0.72). The distributional algorithm had a significantly greater accuracy (t(193) = 7.73, p
substance abuse
What problem does this paper attempt to address?