Screening for lung cancer using thin‐slice low‐dose computed tomography in southwestern China: a population‐based real‐world study

Jiaxuan Wu,Ruicen Li,Huohuo Zhang,Qian Zheng,Wenjuan Tao,Ming Yang,Yuan Zhu,Guiyi Ji,Weimin Li
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1759-7714.15383
IF: 3.223
2024-05-28
Thoracic Cancer
Abstract:Our research systematically and comprehensively studied the optimization and application of low‐dose spiral computed tomography screening for lung cancer. Our analysis is anchored on a robust sample size, meticulously chosen to mirror real‐world clinical scenarios. It unequivocally demonstrates the superior efficacy of thin‐slice low‐dose computed tomography scanning in lung cancer screening. This serves as a dependable reference point and theoretical foundation for refining screening methodologies and crafting guidelines. Objectives Lung cancer is one of the most common malignant tumors threatening human life and health. At present, low‐dose computed tomography (LDCT) screening for the high‐risk population to achieve early diagnosis and treatment of lung cancer has become the first choice recommended by many authoritative international medical organizations. To further optimize the lung cancer screening method, we conducted a real‐world study of LDCT lung cancer screening in a large sample of a healthy physical examination population, comparing differences in lung nodules and lung cancer detection between thin and thick‐slice LDCT scanning. Methods A total of 29 296 subjects who underwent low‐dose thick‐slice CT scanning (5 mm thickness) from January 2015 to December 2015 and 28 058 subjects who underwent low‐dose thin‐slice CT scanning (1 mm thickness) from January 2018 to December 2018 in West China Hospital were included. The positive detection rate, detection rate of lung cancer, pathological stage of lung cancer, and mortality rate of lung cancer were analyzed and compared between the two groups. Results The positive rate of LDCT screening in the thin‐slice scanning group was significantly higher than that in the thick‐slice scanning group (20.1% vs. 14.4%, p
oncology,respiratory system
What problem does this paper attempt to address?