Abstract:Background: To compare surgical outcomes after mitral valve replacement via either minimally invasive thoracoscopic (MIs) or traditional median sternotomy (MS) surgery and determine the short- and mid-term clinical outcomes of the MI approach. Methods: All patients who received either MIs (n=405) or MS (n=691) mitral valve replacement surgery at the Guangdong Cardiovascular Institute between January 2012 and July 2015 were analyzed for outcome differences due to surgical approach using propensity score matching. The best 202 matches from the MI group and the MS group were analyzed. The clinical data of the two groups were collected, including preoperative cardiac function, operative data, postoperative complications, and follow-up. Results: A final total of 404 patients were included in this study after propensity score matching; the MIs group and the MS group each contained 202 patients. The two groups were similar in age, weight, pathological changes, and surgical approach. Compared with the MS group, the MIs group had a longer cardiopulmonary bypass time (P<0.001), aortic cross-clamping time (P<0.001), and total procedure time (P<0.001). There were no significant differences between the groups regarding in-hospital mortality, stroke, pneumonia, acute renal failure, arrhythmia, and chylothorax. The MS group had significantly more patients with poor wound healing than the MIs group (P=0.004). The MI group had a lower rate of transfusion (P=0.037), shorter ventilation time (P=0.041), shorter ICU stay (P=0.033), reduced chest tube drainage and length of chest tube stay (P<0.001), and shorter hospital stay (P<0.001). There was no significant difference between the groups in hospital re-admission for bleeding, but the total hospitalization cost was higher in the MIs group (P=0.002). The mean follow-up was 26.59±12.33 months, the 1-year postoperative survival rate was 98.86%, and the overall survival rate was 97.44%. Compared with the MS group, the MIs group recovered earlier (P<0.05), and returned to work or study earlier (P<0.05). More patients in the MIs group were satisfied with the wound (P<0.001). The MS group had a higher incidence of postoperative osteomyelitis than the MIs group (P=0.028). There were no significant differences between groups in rates of mortality, stroke, pacemaker, reoperation, or 36-item Short Form Health Survey score. Conclusions: Compared with the MS approach, the MIs method of mitral valve replacement has longer cardiopulmonary bypass time and aortic cross-clamp time; however, it does not increase the risk of mortality and complications. Furthermore, MIs causes less trauma, fewer transfusions, less wound infection, faster recovery, faster return to work or study, and greater satisfaction with the incision in the mid-term. MI cardiac surgery is safe, effective, and feasible.

On table extubation is associated with reduced intensive care unit stay and hospitalization after trans-axillary minimally invasive mitral valve surgery

Minimally invasive technique facilitates early extubation after cardiac surgery: a single-center retrospective study

Safe Landing: Feasibility and Safety of Operating Room Extubation in Minimally Invasive Cardiac Valve Surgery

A Retrospective Multicenter Study of Operating Room Extubation and Extubation Timing following Cardiac Surgery

Feasibility of deescalating postoperative care in enhanced recovery after cardiac surgery

A Novel Tubeless Urinary Catheter Protocol Enhanced Recovery after Minimally Invasive Lung Surgery

Comparison of Outcomes Between Early and Late Tracheostomy.

Early and Mid-Term Outcomes of Isolate Mitral Valve Repair Through Minimal Invasive Versus Median Sternotomy Ap-Proach: a Propensity-Matched Analysis

The role of early extubation on short-term outcomes after liver transplantation - A systematic review, meta-analysis and expert recommendations

Mitral valve replacement via minimally invasive totally thoracoscopic surgery versus traditional median sternotomy: a propensity score matched comparative study

Feasibility, safety, and short-term outcome of totally thoracoscopic mitral valve procedure

Minimally invasive direct access mitral valve surgery

Long-term Outcomes of a Totally Thoracoscopic Approach for Reoperative Mitral Valve Replacement: a Propensity Score Matched Analysis.

The impact of minimally-invasive esophagectomy operative duration on post-operative outcomes

Comparative Evaluation of the Incidence of Postoperative Pulmonary Complications After Minimally Invasive Valve Surgery vs. Full Sternotomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials and Propensity Score-Matched Studies

666 EARLY EXTUBATION AFTER ESOPHAGECTOMY IS SAFE. A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS

In operating room extubation after cardiac surgery is associated with decreased incidence of in hospital new postoperative atrial fibrillation

Use Of A Fast-Track Surgery Protocol On Patients Undergoing Minimally Invasive Oesophagectomy: Preliminary Results

Pushing boundaries in cardiac surgery: minimally invasive mitral valve repair combined with tricuspid valve repair and/or other concomitant procedures

Minimally invasive vs. conventional mitral valve surgery: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

Early Enhanced Recovery after Lung Surgery: Early Ambulation 1 Hour after Extubation