Abstract:Mapping the spatial distribution of crystal phases with nm-scale spatial resolution is an important characterisation task in studies of multi-phase materials. One popular approach is to use scanning precession electron diffraction which enables semi-automatic phase mapping at the nanoscale by collecting a single precession electron diffraction pattern at every probe position over regions spanning up to a few micrometers. For a successful phase mapping each diffraction pattern must be correctly identified. In this work four different approaches for phase mapping of embedded precipitates in an Al-Cu-Li alloy are compared on a sample containing three distinct crystal phases. These approaches are based on: non-negative matrix factorisation, vector matching, template matching and artificial neural networks. To evaluate the success of each approach a ground truth phase map was manually created from virtual images based on characteristic phase morphologies and compared with the deduced phase maps. The percentage accuracy of all methods when compared to the ground truth was satisfactory, with all approaches obtaining scores above 98%. The optimal method depends on the specific task at hand. Non-negative matrix factorisation is suitable with limited prior data knowledge but performs best with few unique diffraction patterns and requires substantial post-processing. It has the advantage of reducing the dimensionality of the dataset and handles weak diffracted intensities well given that they occur repeatedly. The current vector matching implementation is fast, simple, based only on the Bragg spot geometry and requires few parameters. It does however demand that each Bragg spot is accurately detected in each pattern and the current implementation is limited to zone axis patterns. Template matching handles a large range of orientations, including off-axis patterns. However, achieving successful and reliable results often require thorough data pre-processing and do require adequate diffraction simulations. For artificial neural networks a substantial setup effort is demanded but once trained it excels for routine tasks, offering fast predictions. The implemented codes and the data used are available open-source. These resources and the detailed assessment of the methods will allow others to make informed decisions when selecting a data analysis approach for 4D-STEM phase mapping tasks on other material systems.

Automating SAED phase identification using ML

Adaptively driven X-ray diffraction guided by machine learning for autonomous phase identification

Semi-Supervised Approach to Phase Identification from Combinatorial Sample Diffraction Patterns

Machine Learning Approach to Enable Spectral Imaging Analysis for Particularly Complex Nanomaterial Systems

Using Machine Learning and Feature Engineering to Characterize Limited Material Datasets of High-Entropy Alloys

Phase prediction in high entropy alloys with a rational selection of materials descriptors and machine learning models

Accelerating Materials Discovery: Automated Identification of Prospects from X‐Ray Diffraction Data in Fast Screening Experiments

Combining low-loss EELS experiments with machine learning-based algorithms to automate the phases separation imaging in industrial duplex stainless steel

Machine Learning-Enabled Image Classification for Automated Electron Microscopy

Exploring Supervised Machine Learning for Multi-Phase Identification and Quantification from Powder X-Ray Diffraction Spectra

A probabilistic deep learning approach to automate the interpretation of multi-phase diffraction spectra

Enhancing deep-learning training for phase identification in powder X-ray diffractograms

Unsupervised Analysis of Optical Imaging Data for the Discovery of Reactivity Patterns in Metal Alloy

Machine Learning approach to muon spectroscopy analysis

Scanning precession electron diffraction data analysis approaches for phase mapping of precipitates in aluminium alloys

Integrated analysis of X-ray diffraction patterns and pair distribution functions for machine-learned phase identification

Reward driven workflows for unsupervised explainable analysis of phases and ferroic variants from atomically resolved imaging data

A deep-learning technique for phase identification in multiphase inorganic compounds using synthetic XRD powder patterns

Automatic Center Identification of Electron Diffraction with Multi-scale Transformer Networks

Automated Structure Analysis of Small Angle Scattering Data via Machine Learning