Generation of synthetic PET images of synaptic density and amyloid from 18 F‐FDG images using deep learning

Rui Wang,Hui Liu,Takuya Toyonaga,Luyao Shi,Jing Wu,John Aaron Onofrey,Yu‐Jung Tsai,Mika Naganawa,Tianyu Ma,Yaqiang Liu,Ming‐Kai Chen,Adam P. Mecca,Ryan S. O’Dell,Christopher H. Dyck,Richard E. Carson,Chi Liu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/mp.15073
IF: 4.506
2021-07-27
Medical Physics
Abstract:<section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Purpose</h3><p>Positron Emission Tomography (PET) imaging with various tracers is increasingly used in Alzheimer's disease (AD) studies. However, access to PET scans using new or less-available tracers with sophisticated synthesis and short half-life isotopes may be very limited. Therefore, it is of great significance and interest in AD research to assess the feasibility of generating synthetic PET images of less-available tracers from the PET image of another common tracer, in particular <sup>18</sup>F-FDG. </p></section><section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Methods</h3><p>We implemented advanced deep learning methods using the U-Net model to predict <sup>11</sup>C-UCB-J PET images of synaptic vesicle protein 2A (SV2A), a surrogate of synaptic density, from <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET data. Dynamic <sup>18</sup>F-FDG and <sup>11</sup>C-UCB-J scans were performed in 21 participants with normal cognition (CN) and 33 participants with Alzheimer's disease (AD). Cerebellum was used as the reference region for both tracers. For <sup>11</sup>C-UCB-J image prediction, four network models were trained and tested, which included 1) <sup>18</sup>F-FDG <i>SUV ratio</i> (<i>SUVR</i>) to <sup>11</sup>C-UCB-J <i>SUVR</i>, 2) <sup>18</sup>F-FDG <i>K<sub>i</sub> ratio</i> to <sup>11</sup>C-UCB-J <i>SUVR</i>, 3) <sup>18</sup>F-FDG <i>SUVR</i> to <sup>11</sup>C-UCB-J distribution volume ratio (<i>DVR</i>), and 4) <sup>18</sup>F-FDG <i>K<sub>i</sub> ratio</i> to <sup>11</sup>C-UCB-J <i>DVR</i>. The normalized Root Mean Square Error (NRMSE), Structure Similarity Index (SSIM), and Pearson's correlation coefficient were calculated for evaluating the overall image prediction accuracy. Mean bias of various ROIs in the brain and correlation plots between predicted images and true images were calculated for ROI-based prediction accuracy. Following a similar training and evaluation strategy, <sup>18</sup>F-FDG <i>SUVR</i> to <sup>11</sup>C-PiB <i>SUVR</i> network was also trained and tested for <sup>11</sup>C-PiB static image prediction. </p></section><section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Results</h3><p>The results showed that all four network models obtained satisfactory <sup>11</sup>C-UCB-J static and parametric images. For <sup>11</sup>C-UCB-J <i>SUVR</i> prediction, the mean ROI bias was -0.3%±7.4% for the AD group and -0.5%±7.3% for the CN group with <sup>18</sup>F-FDG <i>SUVR</i> as the input, -0.7%±8.1% for the AD group, and -1.3%±7.0% for the CN group with <sup>18</sup>F-FDG <i>K<sub>i</sub> ratio</i> as the input. For <sup>11</sup>C-UCB-J <i>DVR</i> prediction, the mean ROI bias was -1.3%±7.5% for the AD group and -2.0%±6.9% for the CN group with <sup>18</sup>F-FDG <i>SUVR</i> as the input, -0.7%±9.0% for the AD group, and -1.7%±7.8% for the CN group with <sup>18</sup>F-FDG <i>K<sub>i</sub> ratio</i> as the input. For <sup>11</sup>C-PiB <i>SUVR</i> image prediction, which appears to be a more challenging task, the incorporation of additional diagnostic information into the network is needed to control the bias below 5% for most ROIs. </p></section><section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Conclusions</h3><p>It is feasible to use 3D U-Net based methods to generate synthetic <sup>11</sup>C-UCB-J PET images from <sup>18</sup>F-FDG images with reasonable prediction accuracy. It is also possible to predict <sup>11</sup>C-PiB <i>SUVR</i> images from <sup>18</sup>F-FDG images, though the incorporation of additional non-imaging information is needed. </p></section>
radiology, nuclear medicine & medical imaging
What problem does this paper attempt to address?