Outcomes of Short and Long Tibial Stems for Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty in a Population of Obese Patients at Two-Year Follow-Up: A Clinical and Biomechanical Study

J. Druel,N. Gelin,M. Ollivier,F. Roseren,P. Habrand,C. Jacquet,J.N. Argenson
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2024.02.047
IF: 4.435
2024-02-25
The Journal of Arthroplasty
Abstract:Background Obesity can be a source of higher failure rates and inferior clinical outcomes after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The aim of this study was to compare outcomes, failure rates, and stress distributions of TKA in obese patients using a short, long, or no tibial stem. Methods A matching process based on the type of stem used and the age allowed included 180 patients who had a BMI >30 and underwent a TKA between January 2010 and December 2019 with a minimum follow-up of two years. They were classified as moderately obese (MO: 30 < BMI 35, N = 90). For each, three subgroups were defined: thirty patients received a 30 mm short stem (SS), thirty received a 100 mm long stem (LS), and thirty received no stem (NS). Patients were assessed preoperatively and postoperatively using the Knee Society Score (KSS). A finite element model was developed to evaluate the biomechanical effects of the tibial stem on stress distribution in the subchondral bone based on BMI. Results The SS patients had significantly higher postoperative KSS Knee score [MO: 88.9 (SS) versus 79 (LS) versus 80.6 (NS); SO: 84.5 versus 72.4 versus 78.2] ( P < 0.0001) and Function score [MO: 90.4 (SS) versus 78.4 (LS) versus 68.5 (NS); SO: 85.5 versus 73 versus 61.8] ( P < 0.0001) compared to LS and NS patients. The biomechanical study demonstrated a BMI-dependent increase in stress in the subchondral bone in contact with the tibial components. These stresses were mainly distributed at the tibial cut for NS and along the stem for SS and LS. Conclusion A short, cemented tibial stem offers better functional outcomes without increasing failure rates compared to a longer stem during primary TKA in a population of obese patients at two-year follow-up. A short tibial stem does not lead to increased stress compared to a long stem, at least for certain BMI categories.
orthopedics
What problem does this paper attempt to address?