Abstract:Socioeconomic position (SEP) may have different effects on cognitive development and family context could play a role in this association. This work aimed to analyse the role of socioeconomic positions, measured via various indicators collected longitudinally, in cognitive development at 7–11 years of age, evaluating the role of family context as a potential mediator. The study sample included 394 and 382 children from the INMA Gipuzkoa and Valencia cohorts, respectively. SEP indicators were assessed during pregnancy (family social class, parental education, employment, and disposable income) and at 7 (Gipuzkoa) and 11 (Valencia) years of age (At Risk of Poverty or Social Exclusion (AROPE)). Family context and cognitive development were measured with the Haezi-Etxadi Family Assessment Scale 7–11 (HEFAS 7–11) and Raven's Coloured Progressive Matrices (Raven's CPM), respectively. Linear regression models were developed to assess the relationships between (a) SEP-family context, (b) SEP-cognitive development, and (c) family context-cognitive development, adjusting for a priori-selected confounders. Simple and multiple mediation analyses were performed to explore the role of family context in the SEP-cognitive development relationship. Lower SEP was related with a lower cognitive score, this association being particularly robust for family social class. SEP indicators were related to subscales of family context, in particular those regarding cognitive stimulation, parental stress, and parenting. A relationship was also found between these three subscales and child cognitive development, mediating the effect of family social class on child cognition by 5.2, 5.5, and 10.8%, respectively, and 12.0% jointly.

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

This paper aims to explore the impact of socioeconomic position (SEP) on children's cognitive development and analyze the potential mediating role of the family environment in this relationship. Specifically, the main objectives of the study include: 1. **Evaluating the relationship between different SEP indicators and cognitive development**: - The study used multiple SEP indicators, including family social class, parental education level, employment status, the Equivalised Household Income Indicator (EHII), and the At Risk of Poverty or Social Exclusion (AROPE), to assess the role of these indicators in children's cognitive development during the ages of 7 - 11. 2. **Analyzing the relationship between SEP indicators and the family environment**: - The study evaluated different aspects of the family environment through the Haezi - Etxadi Family Assessment Scale 7–11 (HEFAS 7–11) questionnaire, including promoting cognitive and language development, promoting social and emotional development, organizing the physical and social environment, parental stress and conflict, and parental characteristics that promote child development. The study explored the relationship between these family environment factors and SEP indicators. 3. **Analyzing the relationship between the family environment and cognitive development**: - The study used Raven’s Coloured Progressive Matrices (Raven’s CPM) to assess children's cognitive development and explored how family environment factors affect children's cognitive abilities. 4. **Estimating the mediating role of the family environment in the relationship between SEP and cognitive development**: - Through mediation analysis, the study evaluated the role of the family environment between SEP and children's cognitive development. In particular, the study focused on the mediating role of three family environment factors, namely cognitive stimulation, parental stress and conflict, and parental characteristics that promote child development, in the relationship between SEP and cognitive development. ### Main findings - **SEP and cognitive development**: - Lower SEP is associated with lower cognitive scores, especially the influence of family social class is the most significant. Families with unemployed parents also show lower cognitive scores. - The At Risk of Poverty or Social Exclusion (AROPE), the risk of poverty, and the risk of material deprivation also show a similar negative correlation, but the confidence interval is close to zero. - **SEP and family environment**: - Lower SEP is associated with a poorer family environment, especially in terms of cognitive stimulation, parental stress and conflict, and parental characteristics that promote child development. - Family social class, education level, employment status, the Equivalised Household Income Indicator (EHII), and the At Risk of Poverty or Social Exclusion (AROPE) are all negatively correlated with these aspects of the family environment. - **Family environment and cognitive development**: - Three family environment factors, namely promoting cognitive and language development, parental stress and conflict, and parental characteristics that promote child development, are significantly related to children's cognitive development. - **Mediation analysis**: - Cognitive stimulation, parental stress and conflict, and parental characteristics that promote child development play a partial mediating role between family social class and children's cognitive development. Specifically, these factors mediate 5.2%, 5.5% and 10.8% of the influence respectively, and the combined mediating role is 12.0%. ### Conclusions - **Both the family's socioeconomic position and the family environment have an important impact on children's cognitive development**. - **Equality policies and positive parenting programs can improve children's cognitive development**. This study not only provides new evidence on the impact of SEP on children's cognitive development, but also emphasizes the important role of the family environment in this process. Through these findings, policymakers and educators can better understand how to promote children's cognitive development by improving the family environment and supporting families.

Socioeconomic position, family context, and child cognitive development

Mediating pathways in the socio-economic gradient of child development

Executive Function Mediates the Relations between Parental Behaviors and Children's Early Academic Ability

Poverty, social exclusion, and mental health: the role of the family context in children aged 7–11 years INMA mother-and-child cohort study

Early-life socioeconomic position and later-life cognitive functioning: A meta-analysis

The Complex Interaction between Home Environment, Socioeconomic Status, Maternal IQ and Early Child Neurocognitive Development: A Multivariate Analysis of Data Collected in a Newborn Cohort Study

Direct and indirect effects of socio-economic status on child development: is developmental parenting a relevant mediator?

Parental socioeconomic status weakly predicts specific cognitive and academic skills beyond general cognitive ability

Socioeconomic Status and Executive Function in Early Childhood: Exploring Proximal Mechanisms.

Cognitive development during early childhood: insights from families living in areas of socio-economic disadvantage

Socioeconomic Status and Child Development

Socioeconomic disadvantage, fetal environment and child development: linked Scottish administrative records based study

Modulatory effects of SES and multilinguistic experience on cognitive development: a longitudinal data analysis of multilingual and monolingual adolescents from the SCAMP cohort

Socioeconomic position during pregnancy and pre-school exposome in children from eight European birth cohort studies

Direct and indirect links between children’s socio-economic status and education: pathways via mental health, attitude, and cognition

Cognitive and brain development is independently influenced by socioeconomic status and polygenic scores for educational attainment

DNA methylation signatures of prenatal socioeconomic position associated with 36-month language outcomes

Are the Effects of Variation in Quantity of Daily Bilingual Exposure and Socioeconomic Status on Language and Cognitive Abilities Independent in Preschool Children?

Cognitive Neuroimaging Studies on Poverty and Socioeconomic Status Differences in Children and Families across the World: Translational Insights for Next Decade’s Policy, Health, and Education

Language development as a mechanism linking socioeconomic status to executive functioning development in preschool

Home Learning Environment and Screen Time Differentially Mediate the Relationship Between Socioeconomic Status and Preschoolers' Learning and Behavioural Profiles