The effects of incretin‐based therapies on weight reduction and metabolic parameters in children with obesity: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

Jian‐Ying Wang,Jyun‐Wei Kang,Chih‐Yuan Wu,Tzu‐Rong Peng,Ling‐Mei Liao,Ming‐Chia Lee,Jen‐Ai Lee,Shih‐Ming Chen
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/obr.13686
IF: 10.867
2024-01-12
Obesity Reviews
Abstract:Summary Background Growing evidence indicates that incretin‐based therapies (IBTs), glucagon‐like peptide‐1 receptor agonists (GLP‐1 RAs), and dipeptidyl peptidase‐4 inhibitors (DPP4is) are effective and safe for treating pediatric obesity patients with or without type 2 diabetes. Therefore, we aimed to perform a systematic review and meta‐analysis for updating current evidence. Methods We searched the PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and the EMBASE database for articles published until September 15, 2023, and limited to randomized control trials. The primary outcomes were changed from baseline in weight metrics and the cardiometabolic profile. A random effects model will be used, as high heterogeneity is expected. All analyses were performed using STATA 17.0. Results Fifteen trials with a total number of 1286 participants were included in our meta‐analysis. Overall, the mean difference in weight change between the IBTs group and the control group was −2.89 kg (95% confidence interval, −5.12 to −0.65, p = 0.011). Additionally, IBTs significantly reduced the HbA1c level and fasting plasma glucose by 0.37% and 6.99 mg/dl, compared with control groups. IBTs showed a little increased risk of GI side effects and hypoglycemia events, but none of the severe hypoglycemia events were occurred in IBTs group. Conclusions Our study results have proved that GLP‐1 RAs are safe, acceptable, and effective in weight reduction and sugar control for children with obesity. In addition, DPP‐4is seems to have no effect on glycemic control and weight loss in childhood obesity. Further research is needed to confirm these findings, especially in younger children.
endocrinology & metabolism
What problem does this paper attempt to address?