Abstract:The Planetary Protection Policy (PPP) has proclaimed the lofty ideal "All the planets, all the time." Originally formulated as Planetary Quarantine Requirements (PQR), the planetary protection policy imposed strict decontamination standards for spacecraft during the initial period of interplanetary exploration. The policy properly has been seen as a work in progress, continuously open to consideration of new data, and subject to periodic re-examination and question with a view toward improvement to better meet the goals of science. This process has led to several revisions of the PPP to improve, simplify and clarify the standards. In keeping with past practice, the policy was recently revised in light of new data and experience, and the current update is pending before the COSPAR Bureau and Council for review and approval. Specific changes to the PPP add Enceladus to the group of target bodies within the solar system subject to heightened protective measures, and modify the provisions regarding the establishment of special regions on Mars. These new updates mark another important development in the evolution of the PPP. The PQR and the PPP were based on the precept that outbound spacecraft to celestial bodies should not contaminate natural celestial environments with Earth organisms. Therefore, the policy generally requires that certain missions, particularly to target bodies that could harbor evidence of past or current alien life, take active measures to decontaminate the spacecraft. Nevertheless, recent and proposed missions demonstrate that significant gaps remain in the policy. Instead of enhancing decontamination the policy actually promotes purposely and intentionally enlarging the number of potentially contaminating Earth organisms carried by a spacecraft that could reach celestial bodies, including those bodies which are subject to active decontamination requirements. Thus, even with the new updates, the PPP may not be fully consistent with the international obligations of the Outer Space Treaty, and the continued existence of the entire PPP policy could be in jeopardy. This article discusses the flight characteristics of two specific missions, one launched and one in development, which are consistent with the PPP but nonetheless pose a substantial risk of biological contamination of celestial bodies. The manner in which the risks can be reduced is identified, and suggestions are made to close some of the gaps that remain in the PPP to comply with international law.

IAU Planet Definition: Some Confusions and Their Modifications

Quantitative Criteria for Defining Planets

The IAU Working Definition of an Exoplanet

Defining planets by a generating function

Public Naming of Planets and Planetary Satellites

A Unified Nomenclature and Taxonomy for Planets, Stars, and Moons

Explanation and Implementation of the IAU 2000/2006resolutions on Fundamental Astronomy

Moons are planets: Scientific usefulness versus cultural teleology in the taxonomy of planetary science

Revised instellation patterns for close-in exoplanets

On the Need for a Classification System for Consistent Characterization of the Composition of Planetary Bodies

Lacuna in the updated planetary protection policy and international law

Reconsidering the Galactic Coordinate System

On The Planetary Theory of Everything

Classifications for Exoplanet and Exoplanetary Systems -- Could it be developed? I. Exoplanet classification

IAU 2015 Resolution B3 on Recommended Nominal Conversion Constants for Selected Solar and Planetary Properties

Constructing a Galactic coordinate system based on near-infrared and radio catalogs

The Reclassification of Asteroids from Planets to Non-Planets

Old and new:planets in the solar system and beyond

The COSPAR Planetary Protection Policy for missions to Icy Worlds: A review of history, current scientific knowledge, and future directions

Giant planet interiors and atmospheres

Physically adequate proper reference system of a test observer and relativistic description of the GAIA attitude