Fractal cycles of sleep: a new aperiodic activity-based definition of sleep cycles
Yevgenia Rosenblum,Mahdad Jafarzadeh Esfahani,Nico Adelhöfer,Paul Zerr,Melanie Furrer,Reto Huber,Famke F Roest,Axel Steiger,Marcel Zeising,Csenge G. Horváth,Bence Schneider,Róbert Bódizs,Martin Dresler
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.07.04.547323
2024-10-02
Abstract:Nocturnal human sleep consists of 4 – 6 ninety-minute cycles defined as episodes of non-rapid eye movement (non-REM) sleep followed by an episode of REM sleep. While sleep cycles are considered fundamental components of sleep, their functional significance largely remains unclear. One of the reasons for a lack of research progress in this field is the absence of a data-driven definition of sleep cycles. Here, we proposed to base such a definition on fractal (aperiodic) neural activity, a well-established marker of arousal and sleep stages. We explored temporal dynamics of fractal activity during nocturnal sleep using electroencephalography in 205 healthy adults aged 18 – 75 years. Based on the observed pattern of fractal fluctuations, we introduced a new concept of fractal activity-based cycles of sleep or "fractal cycles" for short, defined as a time interval during which fractal activity descends from its local maximum to its local minimum and then leads back to the next local maximum. Then, we assessed correlations between fractal and classical (i.e., non-REM – REM) sleep cycle durations. We also studied cycles with skipped REM sleep, i.e., the cycles where the REM phase is replaced by lightening of sleep. Finally, we validated the fractal cycle concept in children and adolescents (range: 8 – 17 years, n = 21), the group characterized by deeper sleep and a higher frequency of cycles with skipped REM sleep, as well as in major depressive disorder (n = 111), the condition characterized by altered sleep structure (in addition to its clinical symptoms).
We found that fractal and classical cycle durations (89 ± 34 min vs 90 ± 25 min) correlated positively (r = 0.5, p < 0.001). Cycle-to-cycle overnight dynamics showed an inverted U-shape of both fractal and classical cycle durations and a gradual decrease in absolute amplitudes of the fractal descents and ascents from early to late cycles. In adults, the fractal cycle duration and participant's age correlated negatively (r = -0.2, p = 0.006). Children and adolescents had shorter fractal cycles compared to young adults (76 ± 34 vs 94 ± 32 min, p < 0.001).
The fractal cycle algorithm detected cycles with skipped REM sleep in 91 – 98% of cases. Medicated patients with depression showed longer fractal cycles compared to their own unmedicated state (107 ± 51 min vs 92 ± 38 min, p < 0.001) and age-matched controls (104 ± 49 vs 88 ± 31 min, p < 0.001). In conclusion, fractal cycles are an objective, quantifiable, continuous and biologically plausible way to display sleep neural activity and its cycling nature. They are useful in healthy, pediatric and clinical populations and should be extensively studied to advance theoretical research on sleep structure.
Neuroscience