Diagnostic value of loop‐mediated isothermal amplification assay for hand, foot, and mouth disease

Ying‐Zhou Chen,Zhi‐Qing Zhan,Li‐Quan Zhou,Min‐Shan Chen,Xun‐Jie Cao,Ya‐Ping Li,Xu‐Guang Guo
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jcla.23776
IF: 3.124
2021-04-01
Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis
Abstract:<section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Background</h3><p>Nowadays, hand, foot, and mouth disease (HFMD) has a significant negative impact on children's health, especially in the Asia‐Pacific region. Loop‐mediated isothermal amplification assay (LAMP) is a highly efficient and convenient novel tool. However, its diagnostic accuracy for HFMD is still not clear. Therefore, we conducted a meta‐analysis in order to evaluate the potential of LAMP assay for the diagnosis of HFMD, in which the reference standard was polymerase chain reaction (PCR).</p></section><section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Methods</h3><p>A protocol was predetermined (CRD42020212882) in PROSPERO. We retrieved seven databases including PubMed for relevant studies published before October 2020. Articles were included if they compared the diagnostic efficiency of LAMP with PCR for HFMD through detecting clinical samples which was more than 15. Statistical analysis was performed by STATA 15.1 software. Risk of bias and applicability were assessed using Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies. No funding was used for the study.</p></section><section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Results</h3><p>A total of 18 retrospective studies including 2495 samples from China were finally included. Reference standards of them included RT‐PCR and non‐RT‐PCR. The merged sensitivity and specificity with 95% confidence interval (95% CI) were 1.00 (0.97–1.00) and 0.97 (0.88–0.99), respectively. The pooled PLR, NLR, and DOR with 95% CI were 11.17 (5.91–21.11), 0.05 (0.03–0.09), and 538.12 (183.17–1580.83), respectively. The AUC of SROC was 1.00 (95% CI: 0.99–1.00).</p></section><section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Conclusion</h3><p>In conclusion, our research revealed high sensitivity and specificity of LAMP in diagnosing HFMD. However, more high‐quality research is required to prove this conclusion.</p></section>
medical laboratory technology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?