Abstract:Over the past decade, the relation between the Balmer-line luminosity of HII galaxies and the velocity width of the emission lines, the relation, has been painstakingly calibrated as a cosmological distance indicator with seemingly spectacular results: the Hubble constant and the energy density of dark energy obtained using the indicator agree remarkably well with the values from canonical indicators. Since most of the luminosity of these young compact starburst galaxies is emitted by a few narrow emission lines, they can be observed with good precision up to redshifts of $z with JWST, making the indicator a potentially unique cosmological probe. However, the precision of the method remains too low to effectively constrain the relevant cosmological parameters, notably the equation of state of dark energy. The scatter of the relation is significantly larger than the random observational errors, so we do not have a good handle on the systematics of the method. In a previous paper, we posited that since the ionizing radiation of these young galaxies fades rapidly over timescales of only a few million years, age differences could be the main underlying cause of the scatter. In this paper, we explore several different ways of explaining the scatter of the correlation, but without success. We show that the majority of HII galaxies are powered by multiple starbursts of slightly different ages, and therefore that the equivalent widths are not reliable chronometers to correct the luminosities for evolution. Thus, it is not likely that the accuracy of the distance indicator can be improved in the near future. Since we do not fully understand either the systematics or the underlying physics of the relation, using large samples of distant HII galaxies may or may not improve the accuracy of the method.

Distance indicators based on the luminosity-profile shapes of early-type galaxies--a reply

Gravitational Wave Source Clustering in the Luminosity Distance Space with the Presence of Peculiar Velocity and Lensing Errors

Clustering of Local Group distances: publication bias or correlated measurements? VI. Extending to Virgo cluster distances

The Brightest Stars in Galaxies Are Not Good Distance Indicators -

Galaxy Scaling Relations from the ACS Virgo and Fornax Cluster Surveys: No Evidence for a Dwarf-Giant Dichotomy

Luminosity dependence of the spatial and velocity distributions of galaxies: semi-analytic models versus the Sloan Digital Sky Survey

The Astrophysical Distance Scale: V. A 2% Distance to the Local Group Spiral M33 via the JAGB Method, Tip of the Red Giant Branch, and Leavitt Law

Anisotropies in the spatial distribution and kinematics of dwarf galaxies in the Local Group and beyond

HII galaxies as standard candles: Evolutionary corrections

Clustering of Local Group distances: publication bias or correlated measurements? II. M31 and beyond

The Next Generation Virgo Cluster Survey (NGVS). III. A Catalog of Surface Brightness Fluctuation Distances and the Three-Dimensional Distribution of Galaxies in the Virgo Cluster

A Study of Two Diffuse Dwarf Galaxies in the Field

Analysis of Galaxies at the Extremes: A Kinematic Analysis of the Virgo Cluster Dwarfs VCC 9 and VCC 1448 using the Keck Cosmic Web Imager

A Review of the Distance and Structure of the Large Magellanic Cloud

The parallelism between galaxy clusters and early-type galaxies: II. Clues on the origin of the scaling relations

Measuring distances to galaxies with globular cluster velocity dispersions

Distances from Surface Brightness Fluctuations

Photometric Properties and Scaling Relations of Early Type Brightest Cluster Galaxies