Abstract:Eye movement strategies employed by humans to identify conspecifics are not universal. Westerners predominantly fixate the eye region during face recognition, whereas Easterners consistently focus more on the nose, yet recognition accuracy is comparable (Blais et al., 2008). However, the face literature has robustly shown that the critical information for face recognition is located in the eyes and partially the mouth, but not the nose. Moreover, since eye movements in natural viewing conditions do not provide unequivocal evidence on the measure of the visual information being used by observers, the question of whether humans universally use similar facial information to recognize faces remains unresolved. To address this issue, we monitored eye movements during face recognition of thirty Western Caucasian (WC) and thirty East Asian (EA) observers with a novel technique that parametrically restricts information outside central vision. We used ‘Spotlights’ with Gaussian apertures of 2°, 5° or 8° dynamically centered on observers' fixations. Face recognition performance improved with increasing Spotlight apertures. Regardless of culture, observers actively fixated the eyes and mouth with constrained Spotlights (2°, 5°). In the 8° condition, information from both eyes and mouth was simultaneously available when fixating the nose and, as expected, only EA observers shifted their fixations towards this region. This central location is optimal to integrate information globally, a cultural marker of Easterners' perceptual strategies. WC observers engage in analytic strategies and their facial feature-by-feature strategy was not affected by Spotlight apertures. Social experience and cultural factors shape the way humans think about the world and regulate the strategies used to extract information from faces. However, these external forces do not modulate the information used to solve this critical biological feat. Human beings rely on identical facial information to recognize conspecifics, a universal law dictated by the evolutionary constraints of nature and not nurture.

Face Feature Change Detection Ability in Developmental Prosopagnosia and Super-Recognisers

Face Recognition Subserves Nature Not Nurture

Both identity and non-identity face perception tasks predict developmental prosopagnosia and face recognition ability

Evidence for a Classical Dissociation between Face and Object Recognition in Developmental Prosopagnosia

Information sampling differences supporting superior face identity processing ability

On the Relation between Face and Object Recognition in Developmental Prosopagnosia: No Dissociation but a Systematic Association

Altered Spontaneous Neural Activity in the Occipital Face Area Reflects Behavioral Deficits in Developmental Prosopagnosia

Separate and Shared Neural Basis of Face Memory and Face Perception in Developmental Prosopagnosia

Multi-Item Discriminability Pattern to Faces in Developmental Prosopagnosia Reveals Distinct Mechanisms of Face Processing.

What is developmental about developmental prosopagnosia?

Face naming and recollection represent key memory deficits in developmental prosopagnosia

EXPRESS: Eye Movement Differences when Recognising and Learning Moving and Static Faces

Multiple-stage Impairments of Unfamiliar Face Learning in Developmental Prosopagnosia: Evidence from Fmri Repetition Suppression and Multi-Voxel Pattern Stability

Deficient Learning from Unfamiliar Face Repetitions in Developmental Prosopagnosia: Evidence from Diminished Fmri Repetition Suppression of the FFA and Decreased Multi-Voxel Pattern Similarity of the MTL

Covert face recognition relies on affective valence in congenital prosopagnosia

Perceptual heterogeneity in developmental prosopagnosia is continuous, not categorical

The Neural Network for Face Recognition: Insights from an Fmri Study on Developmental Prosopagnosia.

Binocular rivalry reveals differential face processing in congenital prosopagnosia

The effect of face masks and sunglasses on identity and expression recognition with super-recognizers and typical observers

Diagnostic feature training improves face matching accuracy.

Individual Differences in Holistic Processing Predict Face Recognition Ability.