Abstract:Abstract Objective: In the absence of treatments to halt or reverse symptoms of Alzheimer's disease, early detection may extend the window for meaningful treatment, advanced planning, and coping. Positron emission tomography (PET) scans for amyloid and tau are validated biomarkers of AD, yet results are rarely disclosed to participants due to concerns about negative impacts. While prior studies suggest limited anxiety, depression, or suicidality following biomarker disclosure, no study to date has examined broader psychological impacts of PET amyloid/tau disclosure to symptomatic individuals. Therefore, we explored post-disclosure changes in future time perspective (perceptions of limited time or possibilities left in the future), self-efficacy for managing symptoms, and perceived stigma as a function of result received. Participants and Methods: Forty-three older adults (age = 72.0±6.2 years; education = 16.5±2.6; 88.4% White Non-Hispanic; 48.8% female) participated in the study, of whom 62.8% were diagnosed with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and the remainder with Dementia of the Alzheimer's type. All participants underwent pre-disclosure biomarker education and decisional capacity assessment, followed by baseline measures. Participants demonstration decisional capacity completed an interactive disclosure session during which they received dichotomous results of their research positron emission tomography (PET) scans for amyloid and tau (elevated versus not elevated for each biomarker). Findings were discussed in relation to presence/absence of Alzheimer's disease, the etiology of their cognitive difficulties, and risk for conversion or further decline. At baseline, immediately following disclosure, and at 1-week follow-up, participants completed several questionnaires: the Future Time Perspective (FTP) scale, a measure of how much the participant sees time as limited, the Self Efficacy for Managing Chronic Disease scale (SECD), and the Stigma Scale for Chronic Illness (SSCI-8), all of which were modified to apply to Alzheimer's disease and associated experiences. Results: The main effects of time (F =1.10, p =.334, A?p 2 =.026), biomarker status (F (1)=3.10, p =.086, Ajp 2 =.070), and the time by biomarker status interaction (F =0.39, p =.661, Ajp 2 =.009) on FTP score was not significant. Though neither time (F =0.07, p =.933, A?p 2 =.002) nor the time by biomarker status interaction (F =2.16, p =.122, Ajp 2 =.050) effect on SECD was significant, being biomarker positive (A+T-/A+T+) was associated with lower self-efficacy (F (1)=5.641, p =.022, Ajp 2 =.121). Neither main effect for time (F =0.15, p =.853, Ajp 2 =.004) or biomarker status (F (1)=0.35, p =.558, A?p 2 =.009) on SSCI-8 was significant. The time by biomarker status interaction was significant ( f =4.27, p =.018, =.096), such that biomarker negative participants experience a transient increase in perceived stigma directly after disclosure that resolves one week later, and biomarker negative participants experience the opposite pattern. Conclusions: Findings suggest that individuals who receive biomarker positive results may feel less competent to manage their symptoms compared to those who are biomarker negative, emphasizing the need for post-disclosure interventions targeting self-efficacy. The effect of disclosure on perceptions of time being limited and on perceived stigma were minimal, even when those results indicate evidence of Alzheimer's disease and risk for clinical progression. These results further support the safety of biomarker disclosure procedures. Future studies should provide longer-term assessment of psychological, behavioral, and clinical outcomes following Alzheimer's disease biomarker disclosure.

"It's just getting the word out there": Self-disclosure by people with young-onset dementia

"Give me the knowledge, and I can do what I want with it, it's my right and my choice": Triangulated perspectives on the disclosure of young onset dementia

Stigma, discrimination and agency: Diagnostic disclosure as an everyday practice shaping social citizenship

Dementia Specialty Care Clinicians' Perspectives on Their Role in the Dementia Diagnostic Process and Diagnostic Disclosure

Perspectives on disclosure of the dementia diagnosis among primary care physicians in Japan: a qualitatively driven mixed methods study

To Tell or Not to Tell: Disclosure and Self-Management among Adults with Early-Onset Type 2 Diabetes: A Qualitative Study

Role of Interacting and Learning Experiences on Public Stigma Against Dementia: An Observational Cross-Sectional Study

Navigating who I was and who I am online: How people with dementia use social media platforms to support identity

"At least we finally found out what it was": Dementia diagnosis in minoritized populations

Autistic Adults’ Experiences of Diagnosis Disclosure

An Exploration of the Peri-Diagnostic Experiences of Lesbian, Gay and Bisexual People With Dementia Using the Candidacy Framework

A Study on the Disclosure of People with Mental Illness

How Do People Affected by Dementia in Wales Experience Their Diagnosis and Post-Diagnostic Support, and How May These Be Improved?

Navigating the Journey of Living with Young-Onset Dementia: Experiences of Spousal Caregivers

8 Perspectives of Self, Stigma, and the Future Following Alzheimer's Disease Biomarker Disclosure in Cognitively Symptomatic Older Adults

Caregivers' Attitude Toward Disclosure Of Alzheimer'S Disease Diagnosis In Urban China

P84: This has been far from easy: How do people affected by dementia in Wales experience their diagnosis, and how can it be improved?

Stigma and its impact on disclosure and mental health secrecy in young people with clinical depression symptoms: A qualitative analysis

I wish I could tell you but I can’t: Adolescents with perinatally acquired HIV and their dilemmas around self-disclosure

42 Talking Lines: stories of diagnosis and support as told by those with lived experience of rarer forms of dementia

Best Practices for Communicating a Diagnosis of Dementia: Results of a Multi-Stakeholder Modified Delphi Consensus Process