Yunhe Wang,Le Shi,Jianyu Que,Qingdong Lu,Lin Liu,Zhengan Lu,Yingying Xu,Jiajia Liu,Yankun Sun,Shiqiu Meng,Kai Yuan,Maosheng Ran,Lin Lu,Yanping Bao,Jie Shi
Abstract:Quarantine and isolation measures urgently adopted to control the COVID-19 pandemic might potentially have negative psychological and social effects. We conducted this cross-sectional, nationwide study to ascertain the psychological effect of quarantine and identify factors associated with mental health outcomes among population quarantined to further inform interventions of mitigating mental health risk especially for vulnerable groups under pandemic conditions. Sociodemographic data, attitudes toward the COVID-19, and mental health measurements of 56,679 participants from 34 provinces in China were collected by an online survey from February 28 to March 11, 2020. Of the 56,679 participants included in the study (mean [SD] age, 36.0 [8.2] years), 27,149 (47.9%) were male and 16,454 (29.0%) ever experienced home confinement or centralized quarantine during COVID-19 outbreak. Compared those without quarantine and adjusted for potential confounders, quarantine measures were associated with increased risk of total psychological outcomes (prevalence, 34.1% vs 27.3%; odds ratio [OR], 1.34; 95% CI, 1.28-1.39; <i>P</i> < 0.001). Multivariable logistic regression analyses showed that vulnerable groups of the quarantined population included those with pre-existing mental disorders or chronic physical diseases, frontline workers, those in the most severely affected areas during outbreak, infected or suspected patients, and those who are less financially well-off. Complying with quarantine, being able to take part in usual work, and having adequate understanding of information related to the outbreak were associated with less mental health issues. These results suggest that quarantine measures during COVID-19 pandemic are associated with increased risk of experiencing mental health burden, especially for vulnerable groups. Further study is needed to establish interventions to reduce mental health consequences of quarantine and empower wellbeing especially in vulnerable groups under pandemic conditions.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
### Problems the paper attempts to solve
This paper aims to explore the impact of isolation measures on the mental health of the general population during the COVID - 19 pandemic, and identify factors related to mental health outcomes, in order to further guide interventions and reduce the mental health risks of the general population, especially vulnerable groups, under pandemic conditions.
### Research background
Since early December 2019, COVID - 19, caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS - CoV - 2), has spread rapidly around the world. In order to control the epidemic, a variety of public health intervention measures have been adopted, including traffic restrictions, social distancing, home isolation and centralized isolation. Although these measures have effectively controlled the epidemic, they may have negative psychological and social impacts, especially among the most vulnerable populations, such as front - line medical workers, children and the elderly.
### Research objectives
1. **Evaluate the impact of isolation measures on mental health**: Through a cross - sectional study nationwide, evaluate the impact of isolation measures on the mental health of the general population.
2. **Identify relevant factors**: Determine the factors related to mental health outcomes among the isolated population, so as to provide an evidence base for policymakers to weigh potential psychological risks when implementing isolation measures.
3. **Support mental health**: Pay special attention to vulnerable groups and propose interventions to reduce the impact of isolation measures on mental health.
### Research methods
- **Participants**: The research subjects were 56,679 participants from 34 provinces in China collected through an online survey from February 28 to March 11, 2020.
- **Data collection**: Demographic characteristics, attitudes towards COVID - 19 and mental health measurement data were collected through questionnaires.
- **Psychometric tools**: The 9 - item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ - 9), the 7 - item Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale (GAD - 7), the 7 - item Insomnia Severity Index (ISI) and the Acute Stress Disorder Scale (ASDS) were used to assess symptoms of depression, anxiety, insomnia and acute stress.
### Main findings
- **The impact of isolation on mental health**: Compared with those who have not experienced isolation, those who have experienced isolation are at higher risk in terms of total mental health problems (34.1% vs 27.3%; OR, 1.34; 95% CI, 1.28 - 1.39; P < 0.001), as well as moderate - to - severe depression (13.6% vs 9.6%; OR, 1.42; 95% CI, 1.34 - 1.50; P < 0.001), anxiety (13.3% vs 9.2%; OR, 1.48; 95% CI, 1.40 - 1.57; P < 0.001), insomnia (7.2% vs 5.1%; OR, 1.44; 95% CI, 1.34 - 1.55; P < 0.001) and acute stress (28.6% vs 22.7%; OR, 1.34; 95% CI, 1.28 - 1.40; P < 0.001).
- **Relevant factors**: Multivariate logistic regression analysis shows that groups with a higher risk of mental health problems among the isolated population include those with a history of previous mental illness or chronic diseases, front - line workers, residents in the most severely affected areas by the epidemic, infected or suspected - infected patients, and those with poor economic conditions. In addition, compliance with isolation regulations, the ability to participate in daily work and a full understanding of epidemic - related information are associated with fewer mental health problems.
### Conclusion
The results of this study indicate that isolation measures during the COVID - 19 pandemic are associated with an increased mental health burden in the general population, especially for vulnerable groups. Further research and the development of interventions are needed to reduce the negative impact of isolation measures on mental health, especially to enhance the mental health and well - being of vulnerable groups during the pandemic.