Abstract:OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the association between obesity and treatment approaches, perioperative factors, and clinical and radiographic outcomes following subtrochanteric fracture fixation. METHODS : Design : Retrospective Cohort Setting: Academic Medical Center Patient Selection Criteria: Patients operatively treated for an AO/OTA 32Axa, 32Bxa, or 32Cxa subtrochanteric femur fracture. Outcome Measures and Comparisons : Injury characteristics, perioperative parameters, fixation information, postoperative complications, clinical and radiographic outcomes. Univariable analyses were conducted between the obese (BMI > 30 kg/m 2 ) and the non-obese (BMI < 30 kg/m 2 ) cohorts. Regression analyses were performed to assess BMI as a continuous variable RESULTS: Of 230 operatively treated subtrochanteric fracture patients identified, 49 (21%) were obese and 181 (79%) were non-obese. The average age of the obese cohort was 69.6 ± 17.2 years, with 16 (33%) males and 33 (77%) females. The average age of the non-obese cohort was 71.8 ± 19.2 years, with 60 (33%) males and 121 (77%) females. Aside from BMI, there were no significant differences in demographics between the obese and non-obese (age [p=0.465], gender [p=0.948], ASA Score [p=0.739]). Both cohorts demonstrated similar injury characteristics including mechanism of injury, atypical fracture type, and AO/OTA fracture pattern (32A, 32B, 32C). Obese patients underwent more open reduction procedures (59% open obese, 11% open non-obese, p<0.001), a finding further quantified by a 24% increased likelihood of open reduction for every 1 unit increase in BMI (OR: 1.2, 95% CI: 1.2-1.3, p<0.001). There was no difference in average nail diameter, 1 vs 2-screw nail design, or number of locking screws placed. The obese cohort was operated on more frequently on a fracture table (p<0.001) when compared to the non-obese cohort which was operated on more frequently on a flat table (p 0.050) in postoperative complications, mortality/readmission rates, hospital quality measures, fixation failure or time to bone healing. CONCLUSIONS: The treatment of subtrochanteric fractures in obese patients is associated with a higher likelihood of surgeons opting for open fracture reduction and the use of different operating room table types, but no difference was observed in postoperative complications, mortality or readmission rates, or healing timeline when compared to non-obese patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Cephalomedullary Nails for Isolated Subtrochanteric Femur Fractures: Age-Related Variations in Fracture Pattern and Perioperative Factors Do Not Affect Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes

Incidence and Risk Factors of Osteonecrosis of the Femoral Head after Cephalomedullary Nailing for Pertrochanteric Fractures: Observational Single-Center Study

Atypical Versus Typical Subtrochanteric Femoral Fractures: Disparate Patient Profiles, Similar Outcomes

Treatment of Unstable Intertrochanteric Fractures with Percutaneous Non-Contact Bridging Plates

Anterior Cortical Impingement With 240 mm Cephalo-Medullary Nail (PFN and PFNA-2) in Intertrochanteric Femur Fracture Fixation in the Indian Population: A Problem Statement

Lessons learned from biomechanical studies on cephalomedullary nails for the management of intertrochanteric fractures. A scoping review

Subtrochanteric hip fractures treated with cerclage cables and long cephalomedullary nails: a review of 17 consecutive cases over 2 years

Surgical Fixation of Subtrochanteric Fracture in Patient with Cancellous Screw Fixation for Neck of Femur Fracture: Surgical Decision-Making and Outcome

Influence of Bone Cement Augmentation on Complications in Cephalomedullary Nail Fixation of Geriatric Intertrochanteric Hip Fractures

Subtrochanteric Femur Fractures: The Association Between Obesity and Perioperative, Clinical, and Radiographic Outcomes

Safety and efficacy of a two-screw cephalomedullary nail for intertrochanteric femur fracture fixation: a retrospective case series in 264 patients

Comparison of Outcomes of Long Versus Short Cephalomedullary Nails for the Fixation of Intertrochanteric Femur Fractures: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of 14,547 Patients

Inferior Outcome after Unstable Trochanteric Fracture Patterns Compared to Stable Fractures in the Elderly

Use of a Trochanteric Fixation Nail-Advanced (TFNA) with cement augmentation for treatment of trochanteric fractures in patients greater than sixty five years of age

Antegrade vs Retrograde Intra-Medullary Nailing in Femoral Shaft Fractures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

INTRAMEDULLARY PROXIMAL FEMORAL NAILING FOR UNSTABLE PERITROCHANTRIC FRACTURE: A PROSPECTIVE STUDY

Treatment of intertrochanteric femur fracture in elderly patients with the proximal femoral nail antirotation: evaluation in terms of union and functional outcome

Case report: unique failure of a Synthes TFNA fenestrated lag screw in a peritrochanteric nonunion

Posterior Sagging After Cephalomedullary Nailing for Intertrochanteric Femur Fracture is Associated with a Separation of the Greater Trochanter

Comparing short vs. intermediate and long nails in elderly patients with unstable multifragmental femoral trochanteric fractures (AO type A2): Multicenter (TRON group) retrospective study

Functional and Radiological Results Following Revision Blade Plating and Cephalomedullary Nailing in Aseptic Trochanteric and Subtrochanteric Nonunion