Overcoming barriers to immediate penile implant salvage surgery: a narrative review

Logan W. Grimaud,David L. Barquin,Jeremy A. Kurnot,Eric S. Adams,Aaron C. Lentz

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21037/tau-23-509

2024-04-13

Translational Andrology and Urology

Abstract:Overcoming barriers to immediate penile implant salvage surgery: a narrative review

urology & nephrology,andrology

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

Narrative review of immediate salvage for penile prosthesis infection

Eric S. Adams,Rafael D. Tua-Caraccia,Aaron C. Lentz

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21037/tau-23-277

2024-04-20

Translational Andrology and Urology

Abstract:Keywords: Penile prosthesis; penile implant; infection; salvage surgery; erectile dysfunction (ED)

urology & nephrology,andrology
(387) Clinical Experience with Malleable Penile Implantation for Salvaging Inflatable Implant Infection

GL Hsu,J Chueh

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jsxmed/qdae001.372

2024-02-07

The Journal of Sexual Medicine

Abstract:Introduction Antibiotic irrigation for treating prostheses is commonly believed to be a proper administration for those whose penile implant contracts with infection. However, there is no standard procedure for the irrigation period. Objective As a result, we encounter patients whose sinusoids were ruined from irrigation attempts for over three months. We sought to report an experience of salvaging penile implantation. Methods From 2010 to 2022, eight patients requested salvage penile implantation for treating unsuccessful inflatable implantation elsewhere. They report repeated antibiotic rescuing and wound debridement from 50 to 121 days of hospitalization. The diameter of the glans penis is measured and recorded in mm. Pelvic X-rays were made while the penis was downward and upward. One 44-year-old patient received no further salvaging penile implant because the corporeal sinusoid had too hardly fused to allow the contrast medium injection. The remaining seven received malleable types of penile implants ambulatory under acupuncture-assisted local anesthesia with which a cavernosal block must be performed in addition to a proximal dorsal nerve block, crural block, and peri penile infiltration. In addition, the novel method of glans enhancement was performed unexceptionally. The approach was longitudinal pubic (n=3) and circumferential (n=2). The pain level was assessed on the acupoint needle location or penis property. It was recorded on blood loss amount and operation times. A 32 to 35 ligation was performed at the retro-coronal venous plexus, which is readily identified by glans milking manipulation. A 5cm coroporotomy was made along the 11 or 1 o'clock position of the corpora cavernosa. To minimize the sinusoidal compression, corporal dilatation was made along the dorsal and medial directions distally and dorsolateral proximally. Neither electrocautery nor a suction apparatus was used because of minimal blood loss from manual compression. The water-tight suture was made to the tunic wound, closed continuously with 6-0 nylon with intermittent enhanced suture per centimeter. The overlying fascia layers and skin were finally closed with 6-zero chromic layer by layer. All patients received postoperative pelvic X-rays evidencing the appropriate housing of the cylinder. Sexual satisfaction was followed up yearly by the INTERNET. Results The operation time was 2.5 to 4.5 hours, and the blood loss was negligible. The pain level was more substantial at the arm acupoint at 71.4% (5/7). It was 11 to 61 months from the first and salvaging prosthesis implantation. The diameter of the glans increased from 26.0±2.3 mm to 35.3±2.2 mm. Four patients report couple satisfaction, whereas the remaining one feels male self-esteemed and female acceptable. All patients reported partial sinusoidal erection and no soft glans syndrome eventually. Conclusions A malleable penile prosthesis is beneficial for salvaging inflatable prosthesis infection. An anatomy-based corporeal dilation seems a proper way to minimize sinusoidal compression, although a larger sample size and longer follow-up are mandatory. The glans enhancement was unexceptionally attainable. Disclosure No.

urology & nephrology
Management of the anatomically complex penile implant candidate through an infrapubic incision: a review of surgical techniques and benefits

Jeffrey Loh-Doyle

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21037/tau-23-182

2024-02-29

Translational Andrology and Urology

Abstract:Keywords: Erectile dysfunction (ED); artificial urinary sphincter (AUS); penile implant; penile prosthesis; buried penis

urology & nephrology,andrology
Preface to "Complex Penile Prosthesis Surgery"

David W. Barham,Jay Simhan,Martin S. Gross

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21037/tau-24-355

2024-09-30

Translational Andrology and Urology

Abstract:Penile prosthesis surgery offers a definitive treatment for men with erectile dysfunction who are refractory to medical management. Over the last five years, there have been almost 1,000 papers indexed in PubMed on penile prosthetics. This large volume of literature makes it challenging for prosthetic urologists to stay abreast of the most up-to-date findings. Additionally, prosthetic urologists are often faced with challenging cases and patients where there is insufficient research for decision-making. This Special Series on Complex Penile Prosthesis Surgery aims to highlight some of the recent advances in prosthetic urology and provide expert opinions on some of the most challenging problems we face. Each article is authored by premier experts within prosthetic urology. This special series covers preoperative patient selection and optimization for the medically complex patient, as well as assessing psychiatric risk factors to optimize patient satisfaction. These review articles also cover the use of inflatable penile prostheses in Peyronie's disease and concomitant lengthening procedures. Some of the most challenging cases prosthetic urologists will face are patients with corporal fibrosis and patients with a history of priapism, both of which are eloquently covered in this series. Additionally included is a review article to help prosthetic urologists overcome barriers to penile implant salvage in the setting of device infection. Readers are also able to learn and stay up to date with the rapidly evolving area of prosthetics in gender affirmative surgery. Also covered is a review of treatment of concomitant stress urinary incontinence at the time of penile prosthesis placement. Rounding out this edition is a thorough surgical technique article regarding infrapubic approach to anatomically complex patients. We appreciate the hard work of the eminent authors who have contributed to this special series and we hope you will find their articles helpful in your approach to penile implant surgery. The views expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of the Defense Health Agency, Brooke Army Medical Center, Wilford Hall Ambulatory Surgical Center, the Department of Defense, or any agency under the U.S. Government. Funding: None. Provenance and Peer Review: This article was commissioned by the editorial office, Translational Andrology and Urology , for the series "Complex Penile Prosthesis Surgery". The article did not undergo external peer review. Conflicts of Interest: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form (available at https://tau.amegroups.com/article/view/10.21037/tau-24-355/coif). The series "Complex Penile Prosthesis Surgery" was commissioned by the editorial office without any funding or sponsorship. D.W.B., J.S., and M.S.G. served as the unpaid Guest Editors of the series. J.S. serves as an unpaid editorial board member of Translational Andrology and Urology from June 2016 to July 2026. J.S. received consulting fees from Boston Scientific and Coloplast. M.S.G. received consulting fees from Coloplast and MenMD. The authors have no other conflicts of interest to declare. Ethical Statement: The authors are accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved. Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/. David W. Barham 1 (Email: dwbarham14@yahoo.com) Jay Simhan 2 (Email: jsimhan@gmail.com) Martin S. Gross 3 (Email: martin.s.gross@gmail.com) 1 Section of Urology, Department of Surgery, Brooke Army Medical Center, Fort Sam Houston, TX, USA; 2 Department of Surgery, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA; 3 Section of Urology, Dartmouth-Hitchock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH, USA Keywords: Penile prosthesis; erectile dysfunction; Peyronie's disease; stress incontinence Submitted Jul 19, 2024. Accepted for publication Aug 22, 2024. Published online Sep 21, 2024. doi: 10.21037/tau-24-355

urology & nephrology,andrology
Perioperative infection prevention during inflatable penile prosthesis surgery: a narrative review

Asia N. Matthew-Onabanjo,Ashley N. Matthew,Efemona Famati,Vy Nguyen,Marc J. Rogers

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21037/tau-23-497

2024-08-31

Translational Andrology and Urology

Abstract:Keywords: Penile implant infection; penile prosthesis; perioperative management

urology & nephrology,andrology
(262) Salvage Penile Prosthetic Surgery, Unique Surgical Technique. Institutional Experience

S Kattan,A Almalki,S Alhumaid

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jsxmed/qdae002.225

2024-03-06

The Journal of Sexual Medicine

Abstract:Introduction `-Penile prosthesis surgery represents the end-stage treatment for erectile dysfunction. It is conventionally used only in cases of erectile dysfunction refractory to pharmacological treatments. -Penile prothesis surgery is associated with a high satisfaction rate and a low complication profile. However, it must be appreciated that the complications of surgery can have devastating consequences on a patient's quality of life and satisfaction and include infection, prosthesis malfunction, penile corporal perforation and penile length loss. -This study discusses the diagnosis and management of infected penile prosthesis with highlighting special intra-operative surgical technique that might be a valuable step in Salvage penile prosthetic surgery Objective Since its introduction in 1996 Mulcahy salvage has significantly improved outcomes for the removal and replacement of infected penile prostheses. Long-term follow up data of Mulcahy salvage show an infection-free rate of 82%. In our study we evaluated the Salvage Penile Prosthetic Surgery Cases done in our tertiary institution since (2000 up to date) and introduce the unique surgical technique that resulted in reduction the re-infetion rate. Methods This is a retrospective, institutional review Results total of 13 Salvage penile prosthetic surgeries done in our tertiary center since between 2000 and 2023 out of them only one case developed reinfection and ended with penile prosthesis removal. Therefor, the rate of re-infection is 8% comparing with latest successe rate of Mulcahy technique (18%) We applied surgical step intra- operative that might be the underling reason of decreasing the the reinfection rate that will be presented in details. Conclusions This retrospective analysis of salvage procedures and replacement of infected penile prosthesis with malleable prosthesis shows a high infection-free rate. Disclosure No.

urology & nephrology
Current devices, outcomes, and pain management considerations in penile implant surgery: an updated review of the literature

Nirupama Ancha,Maya Eldin,Tarah Woodle,Sofia Gereta,Krishna Hariprasad,Imani Butler,E Charles Osterberg Iii,E Charles Osterberg III

DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/aja202386

2024-02-20

Asian Journal of Andrology

Abstract:Abstract Penile prosthesis surgery is a definitive treatment for erectile dysfunction (ED). The two categories of penile prosthesis are endorsed by professional guidelines, inflatable penile prosthesis (IPP) and malleable penile prosthesis (MPP). Each modality of penile prosthesis offers distinct advantages and incorporates specific design features, allowing for personalized device selection that aligns with individual needs and preferences. While the overall complication rate of penile implant surgery remains low, surgeons should maintain a high index of suspicion for complications in the perioperative time period. Multimodal analgesic regimens including nerve blocks and narcotic-free pathways should be administered to manage perioperative pain. Finally, the high patient satisfaction after penile prosthesis surgery underscores the success of this ED treatment option.

urology & nephrology,andrology
Preoperative counseling for penile implant surgery: standardized approach in a high-volume center of excellence

Andries Van Huele,Mariet Lenaers,Koenraad Van Renterghem

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41443-024-00828-3

2024-01-27

International Journal of Impotence Research

Abstract:Shared-decision making is crucial in today's society. Although penile prosthesis surgery has had significant improvements regarding technique and materials over the last few decades - with the highest satisfaction rate in erectile dysfunction treatment at present time -, dissatisfaction can occur because of bad preoperative counseling with the creation of unrealistic expectations. This paper includes a small narrative review regarding the most important preoperative variables to be discussed in the preoperative setting. Literature search was conducted in December 2023 using PubMed. Additionally, our own standardized flowchart for preoperative counseling was added. The most important aspects of preoperative counseling include a description of the pathophysiology of erectile dysfunction as well as alternative treatments. Information should be given about which implant categories exist. Additionally, some information about the procedure itself as well as the financial aspect should be communicated. The most frequent and most important complications should be illustrated. Last but not least, the patient's expectations should be evaluated. Our added standardized flowchart with figure acts as a practical guideline for professionals as well as for patients. Our standardized approach for preoperative counseling emphasizes reasonable postoperative expectations aiming for a well-informed patient with high postoperative satisfaction. Our general strategy is to underpromise and overdeliver.

urology & nephrology
(099) A Preliminary Investigation on the Incidence of Complications and Patient Contentment Following the Surgical Implantation of Inflatable Penile Prosthesis After Salvage Radical Prostatectomy

K Khalaf Alla,J Mehr,R Wang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jsxmed/qdae002.090

2024-03-06

The Journal of Sexual Medicine

Abstract:Introduction Erectile dysfunction (ED) is a common complication post salvage radical prostatectomy (RP). Yet, there is scant data in the literature on complication rates and patient satisfaction in those that undergo inflatable penile prosthesis (IPP) insertion post salvage radical prostatectomy (RP) following targeted radiotherapy for treatment of localized prostate cancer. It is understood that these patients have a higher rate of complications as they have experienced both radiation and prostatectomy adverse events which could alter their overall satisfaction after prosthetic surgeries. Objective Our aim is to conduct a preliminary analysis of IPP complication rates and satisfaction rates in patients that had 3-piece IPP implantation following salvage radical prostatectomy. Methods A retrospective chart review from our institutional database was done from 2018 to 2021. The inclusion criteria were patients that had an inserted 3-piece IPP and a history of salvage RP following radiation therapy. Only patients that participated Erectile Dysfunction Inventory of Treatment Satisfaction (EDITS) questionnaire at least 6 months from implant date were included. Data on satisfaction, IPP infection rates, mechanical failure rates, and overall complications was also collected. Complications include hematoma, erosion, reservoir hernia. Results A total of 22 patients were included in the study. The median age (IQR) is 65 (64–67) years and the median time (IQR) from RP to IPP insertion is 23 (11–49) months. All patients were approached in a penoscrotal manner with submuscular placement of reservoir (Table 1). The satisfaction rate was high at 91.8% on follow up. Overall complications rate was observed in 2 patients. One patient had a mechanical pump failure at 37.9 months while another patient had signs and symptoms of scrotal wall infection at 15 months. Both devices were easily replaced with no post op complication and remained functional on further follow up. Conclusions In patients that underwent salvage prostatectomy IPP insertion, they reported high satisfaction rates and low complication rates despite the exposure to both prostate cancer treatments adverse events. Further research is needed to confirm the results obtained and to investigate the underlying causes for the observed outcomes. The scientific process is iterative, and the answers obtained from one study often lead to more questions and the need for additional investigations. Disclosure No.

urology & nephrology
(284) A Preliminary Investigation on the Incidence of Complications and Patient Contentment Following the Surgical Implantation of Inflatable Penile Prosthesis After Salvage Radical Prostatectomy

K Khalaf Alla,A El-Achkar,J Mehr,R Wang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jsxmed/qdae001.271

2024-02-07

The Journal of Sexual Medicine

Abstract:Introduction Erectile dysfunction (ED) is a common complication post salvage radical prostatectomy (RP). Yet, there is scant data in the literature on complication rates and patient satisfaction in those that undergo inflatable penile prosthesis (IPP) insertion post salvage radical prostatectomy (RP) following targeted radiotherapy for treatment of localized prostate cancer. It is understood that these patients have a higher rate of complications as they have experienced both radiation and prostatectomy adverse events which could alter their overall satisfaction after prosthetic surgeries. Objective Our aim is to conduct a preliminary analysis of IPP complication rates and satisfaction rate in patients that had 3-piece IPP implantation following salvage radical prostatectomy. Methods A retrospective chart review from our institutional database was done from 2018 to 2021. The inclusion criteria were patients that had an inserted 3-piece IPP and a history of salvage RP following radiation therapy. Only patients that participated Erectile Dysfunction Inventory of Treatment Satisfaction (EDITS) questionnaire at least 6 months from implant date were included. Data on satisfaction, IPP infection rates, mechanical failure rates, and overall complications was also collected. Complications include hematoma, erosion, reservoir hernia. Results A total of 22 patients were included in the study. The median age (IQR) is 65 (64-67) years and the median time (IQR) from RP to IPP insertion is 23 (11-49) months. All patients were approached in a penoscrotal manner with submuscular placement of reservoir (Table 1). The satisfaction rate was high at 91.8% on follow up. Overall complications rate was observed in 2 patients. One patient had a mechanical pump failure at 37.9 months while another patient had signs and symptoms of scrotal wall infection at 15 months. Both devices were easily replaced with no post op complication and remained functional on further follow up. Conclusions In patients that underwent salvage prostatectomy IPP insertion, they reported high satisfaction rates and low complication rates despite the exposure to both prostate cancer treatments adverse events. Further research is needed to confirm the results obtained and to investigate the underlying causes for the observed outcomes. The scientific process is iterative, and the answers obtained from one study often lead to more questions and the need for additional investigations. Disclosure No.

urology & nephrology
Reconstruction of Massive Skin Avulsion of the Scrota and Penis by Combined Application of Dermal Regeneration Template (pelnac) and Split-Thickness Skin Graft with Vacuum-Assisted Closure: A Case Report

Jia-Jie Fang,Peng-Fei Li,Jia-Jun Wu,Hai-Ying Zhou,Li-Ping Xie,Hui Lu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v7.i24.4349

2019-01-01

World Journal of Clinical Cases

Abstract:BACKGROUND Although skin avulsions to male external genitalia are rare, they can be both physically and psychologically traumatic. Thus, the necessity for judicious management poses significant challenges to surgeons in order to avoid potential permanent disabilities. We report a case of massive penoscrotal skin avulsion and a composite graft was creatively applied to cover the defect which achieved good results. We believe that this case is of great reference value for fellow surgeons. CASE SUMMARY A 52-year-old male presented with massive traumatic avulsion of the penile and scrotal skin following mishandling of an electric drill. The avulsed skin was missing. The patient was diagnosed with massive skin avulsion of external genitalia. Following initial complete debridement of devitalized or infected tissues, Pelnac dermal substitute was secured to the defect with the assistance of negative-pressure wound closure. In the final step, the silicone layer of Pelnac was removed and a split-thickness skin graft was applied. The defect had healed at the two-month follow-up. The patient now has normal erections and satisfactory sexual function. CONCLUSION Our experience with this wound repair demonstrated that the combination of a dermal regeneration template and a split-thickness skin graft with vacuum-assisted closure is a safe, well-tolerated and efficient solution for the reconstruction of massive penoscrotal skin defects.
The International Penile Prosthesis Implant Consensus Forum: clinical recommendations and surgical principles on the inflatable 3-piece penile prosthesis implant

Eric Chung,Carlo Bettocchi,Paulo Egydio,Chris Love,Daniar Osmonov,Sean Park,David Ralph,Zhong Cheng Xin,Gerald Brock

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41585-022-00607-z

2022-01-01

Nature Reviews Urology

Abstract:Despite significant scientific advances in the modern three-piece inflatable penile prosthesis implant surgery, it is not without surgical risks and can carry additional cosmetic and psychosocial consequences in poorly selected and consented individuals. To address this problem, an international group of key opinion leaders and high-volume prosthetic surgeons reviewed the current guidelines and clinical evidence, discussed their experiences, and formed a consensus regarding inflatable penile prosthesis surgery. The findings of this consensus panel were presented at the 17th biennial Asia Pacific Society of Sexual Medicine scientific meeting. The experts concluded that proper patient selection, informed consent and strict adherence to safe surgical principles are important to optimize clinical outcomes. Furthermore, most intraoperative complications, if recognized, can be addressed intraoperatively to enable placement of the device at the time of initial surgery. Men with significant corporal fibrosis due to Peyronie’s disease, prior prosthesis explantation and priapism, and men who have undergone construction of a neophallus, as well as men who receive concurrent continence surgery, are complex cases requiring additional care and advanced techniques to obtain optimal surgical outcomes. Variability in patient care — in terms of postoperative antibiotic use, pain management, scrotal care, and cycling of the penile prosthesis implant — must be reduced to enable optimization and assessment of outcomes across patient groups.
Risk and benefits of penile length preservation techniques during penile prosthesis implantation: a systematic review by the young academic urologists sexual and reproductive health working group

Marco Falcone,Mirko Preto,Afonso Ribeiro Morgado,Ioannis Sokolakis,Selçuk Sarıkaya,Marco Capece,Paolo Capogrosso,Celeste Manfredi,Georgios Tsampoukas,Giorgio Russo

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/17562872231215177

2024-01-01

Therapeutic Advances in Urology

Abstract:Background: Penile shortening, frequently resulting from end-stage Peyronie’s disease (PD), has a negative impact on patients’ sexual activity and overall quality of life, especially when accompanied by Erectile dysfunction (ED). Various surgical techniques have been described to manage concomitant ED and penile shortening through penile prosthesis (PP) implantation. Objectives: To evaluate the benefits and risks of different penile length preservation techniques during PP implantation. Design: A systematic review of the available literature on the use of penile length preservation maneuvers in conjunction with PP implantation was conducted. Data sources and methods: For this systematic review, three databases (Medline, Embase and Cochrane) and clinical trial.gov were queried for relevant publications from 1 January 1990 to 1 September 2022. The review process followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines. Results: The qualitative analysis included 15 relevant articles involving 1186 adult patients who underwent penile length preservation techniques during PP implantation. Penile lengthening of 1–7 cm was reported. Overall, postoperative complications were described in up to 21.7% of cases. Only five studies reported functional outcomes, showing a significant improvement in postoperative period based on the administered questionnaire (e.g. IIEF – International Index of Erectile Function, EDITS – Erectile Dysfunction Inventory of Treatment Satisfaction). Conclusion: Penile length preservation procedures appear to offer a viable option for managing acquired penile shortening, particularly in cases of PD. However, they are associated with a significant risk of complications. Proper patient selection, thorough discussion of risks and benefits, and referral to high-volume centers are mandatory to achieve optimal outcomes and minimizing complications. Trial registration: PROSPERO database registration CRD42022360758.

urology & nephrology
Penile prosthesis surgery in patients with corporal fibrosis: a state of the art review

Juan I Martínez-Salamanca,Alexander Mueller,Ignacio Moncada,Joaquin Carballido,John P Mulhall

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1743-6109.2011.02281.x

Abstract:Introduction: Penile prosthesis has become one of the most accepted treatment options in patients who do not respond to conservative medical therapies (oral or intracavernous injections). When penile fibrosis is present, this surgery becomes a real surgical challenge even for a skillful surgeon. Aim: The aim of this study was to review latest techniques to implant a penile prosthesis in patients with corporal fibrosis. Methods: We performed a systematic search in the following databases: PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane, SCOPUS, and Science Citation Index without any date limits for the terms: "penile prosthesis,""penile fibrosis,""impotence,""fibrosis,""cavernotomes,""downsized prosthesis cylinders,""patient satisfaction,""penile graft," and "vascular graft." Main outcome measure: We reported in each technique and series data regarding penile size, complication rate, infection rate, technical pitfalls and details, use of additional surgical tools or implanted material (grafts, etc.), patients' satisfaction, and overall success rate. Results: When penile corporal fibrosis is present, this surgery becomes a real surgical challenge even for a skillful surgeon. Over the years, multiple surgical approaches have been suggested to facilitate implantation in this difficult situation. Traditional approaches include the resection of scar tissue, performing extensive corporotomies and the eventually use of grafts to cover the corporal gap. Outcomes can be improved combining the use of techniques for scar incision (extensive wide excision, multiple incisions minimizing excision, corporal counter incisions, corporal excavation technique or Shaeer's technique) and cavernotomes and downsized prosthesis. Surgical strategies like upsizing prosthesis, suspensory ligament release or scrotoplasty must be kept in mind to utilize in this special scenario. Conclusions: Penile prosthesis in a patient with severe corporal fibrosis remains a surgical challenge. There are several techniques and surgical strategies that an implant surgeon should know and manage to minimize complications and improve outcomes.
Recent technological development of penile prosthesis: a literature review

Jay Patel,Basil Zakkar,Michael Polchert,Jacob Tannenbaum,Brian Dick,Omer Raheem

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21037/tau-22-741

2024-01-27

Translational Andrology and Urology

Abstract:Keywords: Penile prosthesis surgery; penile implants; inflatable penile prosthesis (IPP); malleable penile prosthesis

urology & nephrology,andrology
Techniques for Penile Augmentation Surgery: A Systematic Review of Surgical Outcomes, Complications, and Quality of Life

Ugo Giovanni Falagario,Federico Piramide,Karl H Pang,Emil Durukan,Lazaros Tzelves,Anna Ricapito,Loic Baekelandt,Enrico Checcucci,Diego M Carrion,Carlo Bettocchi,Francesco Esperto

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina60050758

2024-05-02

Abstract:The increase in practices related to enhancing penile size can be attributed to the belief that an improved genital appearance contributes to a man's virility, coupled with an altered self-perception of his body. It is crucial to tailor interventions to meet the genuine needs of patients by thoroughly assessing their history, psychological state, and potential surgical benefits, all while considering the associated risks of complications. This systematic review aims to summarize the available evidence on outcomes, complications, and quality of life after penile augmentation surgery, examining both minimally invasive and more radical techniques. A search of the PubMed and Scopus databases, focusing on English-language papers published in the last 15 years, was performed in December 2023. Papers discussing surgery in animal models and case reports were excluded from the present study unless further evaluated in a follow-up case series. The primary outcomes were changes in penile dimensions, specifically in terms of length and girth, as well as the incidence of surgical complications and the impact on quality of life. A total of 1670 articles were retrieved from the search and 46 were included for analysis. Procedures for penile length perceived enhancements include lipoplasty, skin reconstruction plasty, V-Y and Z plasty, flap reconstruction, scrotoplasty, ventral phalloplasty, and suspensory ligament release; techniques for increasing corporal penile length include penile disassembly, total phalloplasty, and sliding elongation. Finally, penile girth enhancement may be performed using soft tissue fillers, grafting procedures, biodegradable scaffolds, and Penuma®. In conclusion, while penile augmentation surgeries offer potential solutions for individuals concerned about genital size, the risks and complexities need to be accounted for.
A narrative review on synchronous concurrent versus delayed sequential surgery in the artificial urinary sphincter and penile prosthesis implantation

Eric Chung

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21037/tau-23-22

2024-08-31

Abstract:Background and objective: In a patient who complains of both stress urinary incontinence (SUI) and erectile dysfunction (ED), prosthetic surgery with a urinary continence device and penile prosthesis implant can offer a definitive solution to address both problems. The AMS 800 artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) device is considered the standard of care to restore SUI while the inflatable penile prosthesis (IPP) device is thought to be superior to a malleable prosthesis to provide a more natural penile erection with higher patient satisfaction rates. The following article explores the current understanding of AMS 800 AUS surgery and IPP device in treating males with concurrent SUI and ED as well as evaluates the advantages and disadvantages of concurrent synchronous dual vs. delayed or staged device implantation. Methods: The available literature on AUS and IPP implantation was reviewed on PubMed and Embase databases between 1 January 2000 and 1 December 2022. This narrative review evaluates relevant key features pertaining to prosthetic surgery with an emphasis on arguments for concurrent synchronous dual vs. delayed sequential surgery for AUS and IPP devices. Additionally, this paper provides a brief surgical description of the techniques and potential complications relating to both prosthetic procedures. Key content and findings: While a great deal is known about the excellent outcomes of both AUS and IPP implantation, there is limited literature published on the outcomes of dual AUS and IPP surgery. The decision to proceed with concurrent synchronous dual vs. delayed sequential two-stage implants is likely determined by the patient's preference, the surgeon's expertise, and the availability of prostheses. In either situation, patients should be counselled regarding the advantages and disadvantages of undergoing synchronous concurrent vs. delayed sequential implants and associated surgical challenges are likely dependent on the patient's anatomy and the surgeon's preference. Conclusions: For carefully selected patients with SUI and ED, dual implantation of AUS and IPP provides a definitive treatment to address both conditions at the same time. Patients should be counselled regarding the advantages and disadvantages of synchronous concurrent vs. sequentially delayed implants while technical considerations regarding the sequence of prosthetic device surgery are likely dependent on the patient's factors and the surgeon's preference and surgical expertise.
(411) The “Unfolding” Technique for Penile Prosthesis Implantation in Post-priapism Corporeal Fibrosis

M Abdel Rassoul

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jsxmed/qdad060.385

2023-05-01

The Journal of Sexual Medicine

Abstract:Abstract Introduction `- In neglected cases of ischemic priapism, there is usually severe corporeal fibrosis that can render penile prosthesis implantation later on extremely difficult. - Although many researchers described different approaches to overcome difficulties during surgery, none of them offered satisfactory results. Objective `- to describe a new technique to insert a large sized penile prosthesis in patients suffering from ED after neglected ischemic priapism with resultant severe corporeal fibrosis. Methods `- A new surgical technique was done in 15 patients suffering from ED after prolonged ischemic priapism with severe corporeal fibrosis. - Surgery starts by a circumcision incision, complete degloving & delivery of the penis through a midline perineal incision. - The penile urethra is then dissected away from the ventral surface of both corpora cavernosa - A midline ventral incision is done between both corpora cavernosa. This incision is then deepened till it reaches the inner surface of the tunica albuginea. At this point, the scalpel is then rotated 90 degrees to unfold the core of fibrosis into a flat sheet continuous with tunica albuginea. - The process is then repeated on the other side. - The proximal crura are then dilated in the usual manner by metal dilators. The distal part of the corpora are bluntly dilated by the closed blades of scissors. - After inserting the penile prosthesis, both sheets of fibrosis are closed over both prosthetic rods in the midline and the penile urethra is then fixed back to its position. - The penis is then retuned to its normal anatomical site & the skin is closed. Results `- Successful surgery was achieved in 13 out of 15 patients (86.7%). - 2 patients developed infection that necessitated surgical removal of the rods. - no incidence of urethral injury, crossover or corporal perforation Conclusions `- The new “un-folding” technique is feasible and useful technique in patients with ED after prolonged ischemic priapism - The incidence of complications esp. urethral erosion, crossover and corporal perforation. Disclosure No

urology & nephrology
The Baltimore Criteria for an ethical approach to penile transplantation: a clinical guideline

Ledibabari M Ngaage,Adekunle Elegbede,Jeremy Sugarman,Arthur J Nam,Carisa M Cooney,Damon S Cooney,Yvonne M Rasko,Gerald Brandacher,Richard J Redett

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/tri.13545

Abstract:Significant advances and increasing acceptance of vascularized composite allotransplantation (VCA) have contributed to emerging success of penile transplantation. The aims of penile transplantation are fourfold: adequate urinary function, enabling natural erections, restoration of erogenous sensation and appearance of external male genitalia. Successful penile transplantation also requires limiting risks and managing complications of lifelong immunosuppression. Given the limited experience with this procedure, potential recipients must understand that penile transplantation is not currently standard of care and long-term functional outcomes are unknown. Moreover, these transplants are associated with complex ethical issues. Nevertheless, as the efficacy and safety of penile transplantation are being evaluated, clear indications for transplant are needed. Although preliminary recommendations have been proposed, a more comprehensive framework is needed. We performed a literature review for English language publications related to penile transplantation and ethics. Based on the results of the search, a review of prior recommendations, and our experience performing the first whole male genital allotransplantation including penis, scrotum and abdominal wall; screening and identifying potential donors and recipients for the procedure; and addressing the associated ethical issues, we propose guidelines for responsible penile transplantation: The Baltimore Criteria for an Ethical Approach to Penile Transplantation.
The role of imaging in patients with corporal fibrosis undergoing penile prosthesis placement: a narrative review

Esther García Rojo,Lisa Kollitsch,Borja García Gómez,Manuel Alonso Isa,Javier Romero Otero,Ignacio Moncada,Daniar Osmonov

DOI: https://doi.org/10.22514/j.androl.2024.016

Abstract:Penile prosthesis implantation (PPI) is a definitive solution for severe erectile dysfunction unresponsive to conventional therapies. However, in patients with corporal fibrosis (CF), the procedure presents significant challenges and higher complication risks. This narrative review explores the crucial role of imaging techniques, such as ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging, in preoperative planning for PPI in patients with CF. Through a comprehensive literature search, we analyzed studies focusing on the efficacy of these imaging modalities in assessing fibrosis severity and guiding surgical strategies. Our findings highlight that advanced imaging provides essential insights into fibrosis extent, thereby optimizing surgical outcomes and reducing potential complications. The review underscores the importance of meticulous preoperative imaging in improving patient management and surgical precision in this complex clinical scenario.

Overcoming barriers to immediate penile implant salvage surgery: a narrative review

Narrative review of immediate salvage for penile prosthesis infection

(387) Clinical Experience with Malleable Penile Implantation for Salvaging Inflatable Implant Infection

Management of the anatomically complex penile implant candidate through an infrapubic incision: a review of surgical techniques and benefits

Preface to "Complex Penile Prosthesis Surgery"

Perioperative infection prevention during inflatable penile prosthesis surgery: a narrative review

(262) Salvage Penile Prosthetic Surgery, Unique Surgical Technique. Institutional Experience

Current devices, outcomes, and pain management considerations in penile implant surgery: an updated review of the literature

Preoperative counseling for penile implant surgery: standardized approach in a high-volume center of excellence

(099) A Preliminary Investigation on the Incidence of Complications and Patient Contentment Following the Surgical Implantation of Inflatable Penile Prosthesis After Salvage Radical Prostatectomy

(284) A Preliminary Investigation on the Incidence of Complications and Patient Contentment Following the Surgical Implantation of Inflatable Penile Prosthesis After Salvage Radical Prostatectomy

Reconstruction of Massive Skin Avulsion of the Scrota and Penis by Combined Application of Dermal Regeneration Template (pelnac) and Split-Thickness Skin Graft with Vacuum-Assisted Closure: A Case Report

The International Penile Prosthesis Implant Consensus Forum: clinical recommendations and surgical principles on the inflatable 3-piece penile prosthesis implant

Risk and benefits of penile length preservation techniques during penile prosthesis implantation: a systematic review by the young academic urologists sexual and reproductive health working group

Penile prosthesis surgery in patients with corporal fibrosis: a state of the art review

Recent technological development of penile prosthesis: a literature review

Techniques for Penile Augmentation Surgery: A Systematic Review of Surgical Outcomes, Complications, and Quality of Life

A narrative review on synchronous concurrent versus delayed sequential surgery in the artificial urinary sphincter and penile prosthesis implantation

(411) The “Unfolding” Technique for Penile Prosthesis Implantation in Post-priapism Corporeal Fibrosis

The Baltimore Criteria for an ethical approach to penile transplantation: a clinical guideline

The role of imaging in patients with corporal fibrosis undergoing penile prosthesis placement: a narrative review