Abstract:Background Dual blockade of PD-L1 and VEGF has enhanced anticancer immunity through multiple mechanisms and augmented antitumour activity in multiple malignancies. We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of atezolizumab (anti-PD-L1) alone and combined with bevacizumab (anti-VEGF) in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. Methods GO30140 is an open-label, multicentre, multiarm, phase 1b study that enrolled patients at 26 academic centres and community oncology practices in seven countries worldwide. The study included five cohorts, and the two hepatocellular carcinoma cohorts, groups A and F, are described here. Inclusion criteria for these two groups included age 18 years and older; histologically, cytologically, or clinically (per American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases criteria) confirmed unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma that was not amenable to curative treatment; no previous systemic treatment; and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1. In group A, all patients received atezolizumab (1200 mg) and bevacizumab (15 mg/kg) intravenously every 3 weeks. In group F, patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive intravenous atezolizumab (1200 mg) plus intravenous bevacizumab (15 mg/kg) every 3 weeks or atezolizumab alone by interactive voice-web response system using permuted block randomisation (block size of two) and stratification factors of geographical region; macrovascular invasion, extrahepatic spread, or both; and baseline a-fetoprotein concentration. Primary endpoints were confirmed objective response rate in all patients who received the combination treatment for group A and progression-free survival in the intention-totreat population in group F, both assessed by an independent review facility according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1. In both groups, safety was assessed in all patients who received at least one dose of any study treatment. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02715531, and is closed to enrolment. Findings In group A, 104 patients were enrolled between July 20,2016, and July 31,2018, and received atezolizumab plus bevacizumab. With a median follow-up of 12.4 months (IQR 8.0-16.2), 37 (36%; 95% CI 26-46) of 104 patients had a confirmed objective response. The most common grade 3-4 treatment-related adverse events were hypertension (13 [13%]) and proteinuria (seven [7%]). Treatment-related serious adverse events occurred in 25 (24%) patients and treatment-related deaths in three (3%) patients (abnormal hepatic function, hepatic cirrhosis, and pneumonitis). In group F, 119 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned (60 to atezolizumab plus bevacizumab; 59 to atezolizumab monotherapy) between May 18,2018, and March 7,2019. With a median follow-up of 6.6 months (IQR 5.5-8.5) for the atezolizumab plus bevacizumab group and 6.7 months (4.2-8.2) for the atezolizumab monotherapy group, median progression-free survival was 5.6 months (95% CI 3.6-7.4) versus 3.4 months (1.9-5.2; hazard ratio 0.55; 80% CI 0.40-0.74; p=0.011). The most common grade 3-4 treatment-related adverse events in group F were hypertension (in three [5%] patients in the atezolizumab plus bevacizumab group; none in the atezolizumab monotherapy group) and proteinuria (in two [3%] patients in the atezolizumab plus bevacizumab group; none in the atezolizumab monotherapy group). Treatment-related serious adverse events occurred in seven (12%) patients in the atezolizumab plus bevacizumab group and two (3%) patients in the atezolizumab monotherapy group. There were no treatment-related deaths. Interpretation Our study shows longer progression-free survival with a combination of atezolizumab plus bevacizumab than with atezolizumab alone in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma not previously treated with systemic therapy. Therefore, atezolizumab plus bevacizumab might become a promising treatment option for these patients. This combination is being compared with standard-of-care sorafenib in a phase 3 trial. Copyright (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

No correlation between MASLD and poor outcome of Atezolizumab‐Bevacizumab therapy in patients with advanced HCC

Abstract CT044: Genomic Correlates of Clinical Benefits from Atezolizumab Combined with Bevacizumab Vs. Atezolizumab Alone in Patients with Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC)

The synergic effect of metformin with atezolizumab/ bevacizumab in masld hcc patients: a retrospective study from arte multicentric Italian dataset

Aetiology of hepatocellular carcinoma and response to immunotherapy: is the problem inherent in the classification of non-viral disease?

Comparison of the treatment effect between lenvatinib and atezolizumab plus bevacizumab for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma in pathologically diagnosed metabolic dysfunction–associated steatotic liver disease.

Impact of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease on the efficacy of immunotherapy in patients with chronic hepatitis B-related hepatocellular carcinoma

The neutrophil‐to‐lymphocyte ratio at the start of the second course during atezolizumab plus bevacizumab therapy predicts therapeutic efficacy in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: A multicenter analysis

MASLD-related HCC: Multicenter study comparing patients with and without cirrhosis

Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease is Associated with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor-Based Treatment Response in Patients with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer with Liver Metastases

Association of serum lactate dehydrogenase with prognosis and tumor metabolism in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma treated with atezolizumab plus bevacizumab therapy

Risk of de novo HCC in patients with MASLD following direct-acting antiviral-induced cure of HCV infection

Atezolizumab with or Without Bevacizumab in Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma (GO30140): an Open-Label, Multicentre, Phase 1b Study

Predictors of Survival in Patients With Hepatocellular Cancer Receiving Atezolizumab and Bevacizumab

Identification of factors associated with primary refractoriness to atezolizumab plus bevacizumab in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma

Hepatic decompensation is the major driver of mortality in patients with HCC treated with atezolizumab plus bevacizumab: The impact of successful antiviral treatment

Impact of concurrent MASLD on early-stage HCC following curative resection in chronic hepatitis B

Prevalence and prognosis of patients with MASLD-related cirrhosis after an ICU hospitalization in France: A single-centre prospective study

Can AtezoBev be a safe and effective option for treating hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with Child-Pugh B cirrhosis? A retrospective multicenter real-world study

Efficacy of Αtezolizumab-Βevacizumab in BCLC-C cirrhotic patients with hepatocellular carcinoma according to the type of disease progression, the type of BCLC-C and liver disease severity

Portal hypertension is associated with poorer outcome and clinical liver decompensation in patients with HCC treated with Atezolizumab-Bevacizumab

Safety and Efficacy of Atezolizumab/Bevacizumab in Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma and Impaired Liver Function: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis