All Three Supersystems—Nervous, Vascular, and Immune—Contribute to the Cortical Infarcts After Subarachnoid Hemorrhage

Jens P. Dreier,Alexander Joerk,Hiroki Uchikawa,Viktor Horst,Coline L. Lemale,Helena Radbruch,Devin W. McBride,Peter Vajkoczy,Ulf C. Schneider,Ran Xu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12975-024-01242-z

2024-05-02

Translational Stroke Research

Abstract:The recently published DISCHARGE-1 trial supports the observations of earlier autopsy and neuroimaging studies that almost 70% of all focal brain damage after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage are anemic infarcts of the cortex, often also affecting the white matter immediately below. The infarcts are not limited by the usual vascular territories. About two-fifths of the ischemic damage occurs within ~ 48 h; the remaining three-fifths are delayed (within ~ 3 weeks). Using neuromonitoring technology in combination with longitudinal neuroimaging, the entire sequence of both early and delayed cortical infarct development after subarachnoid hemorrhage has recently been recorded in patients. Characteristically, cortical infarcts are caused by acute severe vasospastic events, so-called spreading ischemia, triggered by spontaneously occurring spreading depolarization. In locations where a spreading depolarization passes through, cerebral blood flow can drastically drop within a few seconds and remain suppressed for minutes or even hours, often followed by high-amplitude, sustained hyperemia. In spreading depolarization, neurons lead the event, and the other cells of the neurovascular unit (endothelium, vascular smooth muscle, pericytes, astrocytes, microglia, oligodendrocytes) follow. However, dysregulation in cells of all three supersystems—nervous, vascular, and immune—is very likely involved in the dysfunction of the neurovascular unit underlying spreading ischemia. It is assumed that subarachnoid blood, which lies directly on the cortex and enters the parenchyma via glymphatic channels, triggers these dysregulations. This review discusses the neuroglial, neurovascular, and neuroimmunological dysregulations in the context of spreading depolarization and spreading ischemia as critical elements in the pathogenesis of cortical infarcts after subarachnoid hemorrhage.

neurosciences,clinical neurology

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The problem that this paper attempts to solve is to understand the pathophysiological mechanisms of cortical infarction after subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH), especially to explore the roles of the three major systems of nerve, blood vessel and immunity in the development of cortical infarction. Specifically, the paper focuses on:

1. **Main features of early and delayed cortical infarction**: The paper points out that approximately 70% of focal brain injuries are caused by cortical ischemic infarction, and these infarctions usually affect the cerebral cortex and the underlying white matter. About 40% of the ischemic injuries occur within the first 48 hours, while the remaining 60% occur gradually within 3 weeks.

2. **Triggering mechanisms of cortical infarction**: The paper emphasizes the crucial role of acute severe vasospasm events (called spreading ischemia) in cortical infarction. These vasospasm events are triggered by spontaneous spreading depolarization (SD), leading to a sharp decrease in local cerebral blood flow, which may last from several minutes to several hours, and are often followed by high - amplitude persistent hyperemia.

3. **Spreading depolarization and dysfunction of the neurovascular unit**: The paper discusses that during the process of spreading depolarization, neurons initiate the event first, and then cells of other neurovascular units (such as endothelial cells, vascular smooth muscle cells, pericytes, astrocytes, microglia and oligodendrocytes) are also involved. However, the cell dysfunction of the three major systems of nerve, blood vessel and immunity is likely to be an important factor leading to the dysfunction of the neurovascular unit.

4. **The influence of subacute subdural hematoma**: The paper believes that the subacute subdural hematoma directly covering the cortex and its blood products entering the brain parenchyma through the glymphatic pathway may trigger the above - mentioned dysfunctions, thus leading to cortical infarction.

5. **Development of diagnosis and treatment strategies**: In order to develop effective diagnosis and treatment strategies, it is particularly important to better understand the pathophysiological mechanisms of focal brain injuries. The paper specifically mentions that automatic real - time detection of delayed cerebral ischemia (DCI) is crucial for timely intervention, especially when most high - risk patients are in a coma.

In summary, this paper aims to comprehensively overview the complex pathophysiological mechanisms of cortical infarction after subarachnoid hemorrhage, focusing on the interaction of the nerve, blood vessel and immune systems in this process, in order to provide a theoretical basis for future clinical diagnosis and treatment.