Evidence for ‘ Introns-Late ’ from Intron Phase Distribution

N. Kenmochi,Hung D. Nguyen,M. Yoshihama

Abstract:There are currently two opposing theories of intron origin. The introns-early theory proposes that introns already existed at the progenote (i.e., the last common ancestor of prokaryotes and eukaryotes) to facilitate the construction of the first genes. The introns-late theory, on the other hand, holds that genes at the progenote were intronless, similar to those in present-day prokaryotes, and introns were gained late, after the emergence of eukaryotes. There has been no decisive resolution to the debate, and each of these theories has supporting arguments that have not been satisfactorily disproved. Introns can be located in one of three phases: phase-0, -1, and -2 introns are defined as introns located before the first, after the first, and after the second nucleotide of a codon, respectively. The distribution of intron phases is nonuniform, with an excess of phase-0 introns. Introns-early explains this by speculating that a fraction of present-day introns were present between minigenes in the progenote and therefore must lie in phase-0. In contrast, introns-late predicts that the nonuniformity of intron phase distribution reflects the nonrandomness of intron insertions. In this work, we tried to resolve the introns-early versus introns-late debate by testing the explanations of these two theories for the current excess of phase-0 introns.

Biology