Abstract:Abstract. This paper combines research and commentary to reinforce the importance of integrating hazard interactions and interaction networks (cascades) into multi-hazard methodologies. We present a synthesis of the differences between multi-layer single-hazard approaches and multi-hazard approaches that integrate such interactions. This synthesis suggests that ignoring interactions between important environmental and anthropogenic processes could distort management priorities, increase vulnerability to other spatially relevant hazards or underestimate disaster risk. In this paper we proceed to present an enhanced multi-hazard framework through the following steps: (i) description and definition of three groups (natural hazards, anthropogenic processes and technological hazards/disasters) as relevant components of a multi-hazard environment, (ii) outlining of three types of interaction relationship (triggering, increased probability, and catalysis/impedance), and (iii) assessment of the importance of networks of interactions (cascades) through case study examples (based on the literature, field observations and semi-structured interviews). We further propose two visualisation frameworks to represent these networks of interactions: hazard interaction matrices and hazard/process flow diagrams. Our approach reinforces the importance of integrating interactions between different aspects of the Earth system, together with human activity, into enhanced multi-hazard methodologies. Multi-hazard approaches support the holistic assessment of hazard potential and consequently disaster risk. We conclude by describing three ways by which understanding networks of interactions contributes to the theoretical and practical understanding of hazards, disaster risk reduction and Earth system management. Understanding interactions and interaction networks helps us to better (i) model the observed reality of disaster events, (ii) constrain potential changes in physical and social vulnerability between successive hazards, and (iii) prioritise resource allocation for mitigation and disaster risk reduction.

Assessing interaction networks with applications to catastrophe dynamics and disaster management

A Simulation Study for Emergency/Disaster Management by Applying Complex Networks Theory

Multihazards Scenario Generator: A Network-Based Simulation of Natural Disasters

Dynamics of Disaster Spreading in Complex Networks

Modelling Infrastructure Interdependencies and Cascading Effects Using Temporal Networks

Dynamic Simulation of the Probable Propagation of a Disaster in an Engineering System Using a Scenario-Based Hybrid Network Model

Modeling the Dynamics of Disaster Spreading from Key Nodes in Complex Networks

Hazard interactions and interaction networks (cascades) within multi-hazard methodologies

A Dynamic Interaction Assessment Method for Disaster Management Based on Extended DEMATEL

Framework for Modeling Interdependent Effects in Natural Disasters: Application to Wind Engineering

Infection-induced Cascading Failures -- Impact and Mitigation

Infection-induced cascading failures – impact and mitigation

Epidemionics: from the host-host interactions to the systematic analysis of the emergent macroscopic dynamics of epidemic networks

A New Model for Describing Evolution and Control of Disaster System Including Instantaneous and Continuous Actions

Untangling the interplay between epidemic spreading and transmission network dynamic

Dynamic Behavior of the Interaction Between Epidemics and Cascades on Heterogeneous Networks

Assessing the impact of disease incidence and immunization on the resilience of complex networks during epidemics

Estimation and Improvement of Disaster Spreading Models Based on Complex Network

Stochastic Dynamic Network Utility Maximization with Application to Disaster Response

Optimizing Complex Interaction Dynamics in Critical Infrastructure with a Stochastic Kinetic Model.

A Hierarchical Decision-Making Framework in Social Networks for Efficient Disaster Management