Brief remote psychological treatments for healthcare workers with emotional distress during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic: a randomized clinical trial
Giovanni Abrahao Salum Jr.,Marianna de Abreu Costa,Lucas Spanemberg,Andre Rafael Simioni,Natan Pereira Gosmann,Livia Hartmann de Souza,Pim Cuijpers,Daniel Samuel Pine,Andre Russowsky Brunoni,Christian Haag Kristensen,Marcelo Pio de Almeida Fleck,Gisele Gus Manfro,Carolina Blaya Dreher
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.09.04.24313084
2024-09-05
Abstract:BACKGROUND. The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic has catalyzed a widespread mental health crisis, impacting millions of people. This study aimed to compare three brief remote psychological treatments for healthcare workers with emotional distress during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic.
METHODS. Nationwide three-arm randomized clinical trial in Brazil. This is a transdiagnostic study that included professionals and students from health services with high levels of anxiety, depression, or irritability symptoms, as defined by Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS). The exclusion criterion was positive suicide risk. Participants were randomized single session psychoeducation group plus weekly personalized pre-recorded videos for four weeks (SSI-ET), brief cognitive behavioral telepsychotherapy group (B-CBT, four sessions), or brief interpersonal telepsychotherapy (B-IPT, four sessions). This study was registered in clinicaltrials.gov ( ). The primary outcome was the proportion of participants with a 50% reduction in T-scores in PROMIS rating scales of anxiety, depression, and/or irritability at one-month.
FINDINGS. Of the 3328 volunteers assessed for eligibility, 999 participants were enrolled, from May 19th 2020 to December 31st 2021, and allocated to SSI-ET (n=342), B-CBT (n=323), or B-IPT (n=334). All three groups showed significant symptom reductions in the one-month assessment that were maintained over the three and six-month follow-ups (Cohen's d range = 0.94-1.36, p<0.001), with no significant difference between groups. The estimated proportion of responders were 46.5%, 43.7% and 44.6% for SSI-ET, B-CBT and B-IPT, respectively.
Conclusions. Our results refute the hypothesis that therapeutic interventions with higher number of sessions and with more specialized therapeutic components offer advantages in alleviating emotional distress, particularly among healthcare workers facing epidemic emergencies. These results have critical implications for planning interventions for crisis responses, especially in settings with limited resources.
FUNDING. Ministry of Health of Brazil, Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior, Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico, and Fundo de Incentivo a Pesquisa/Hospital de Clinicas de Porto Alegre.