Concordance Between the Expert Reading of Biparametric-MRI and the Non-Expert Multiparametric-MRI for the Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer: Clinical Implications

Nahuel Paesano,María José Gutiérrez Vallecillo,Violeta Catalá,Larisa Tcholakian,Xavier Alomar,Miguel Barranco,Abel González-Huete,Jonathan Hernández Mancera,Enric Trilla,Juan Morote
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clgc.2024.102233
IF: 3.121
2024-10-06
Clinical Genitourinary Cancer
Abstract:Purpose Prostate-magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) interpretation is challenging, with expertise playing a crucial role. Biparametric MRI (bpMRI) is gaining popularity in experienced centers due to its time and cost advantages over multiparametric MRI (mpMRI). We aim to analyze concordance between non-expert radiologist PI-RADS from mpMRI and expert radiologist PI-RADS from bpMRI, and its clinical implications. Material and Methods 222 men suspected of having prostate cancer (PCa) and mpMRI reported by non-expert radiologists were referred to a reference center for transperineal MRI-TRUS fusion biopsy where an expert radiologist reported bpMRI PI-RADS 2.1 and segmentation, blinded to external mpMRI. Mapping targeted suspected lesions and 12-core systematic biopsies were performed. Clinically significant PCa (csPCa) was diagnosed when ISUP-grade group was ≥2. Results Concordance between both PI-RADS existed in 49.1% of cases (Kappa index 0.288). In 102 cases (45.9%), expert reclassification to lower PI-RADS existed, while an increase existed in 11 cases (5.0%), p <0.001. Agreement existed in 30.8% of non-expert PI-RADS 3, 43.6% of PI-RADS 4, and 83.7% of PI-RADS 5, p <0.001. Potential clinical implications included 27% reduction in prostate biopsies when using expert bpMRI readings compared to non-expert mpMRI readings (p < 0.001), while undetected csPCa were 4.2% and 3.4%, respectively, p =0.669. Over-detection reduction of insignificant PCa was 29.4% and 0%, respectively, p =0.034. Conclusions Concordance between non-expert PI-RADS mpMRI and expert PI-RADS bpMRI was low, increasing with non-expert PI-RADS. Expert reclassification would reduce prostate biopsies by more than one quarter and over-detection of iPCa, while csPCa detection remained similar. Micro-abstract This study analyzes the concordance between non-expert radiologists' readings of multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) and expert readings of biparametric MRI (bpMRI) in the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer. A low concordance (49.1%) was found, with expert reclassification potentially reducing prostate biopsies by 27% and the over-detection of insignificant cancers, without compromising the detection of clinically significant cancers.
oncology,urology & nephrology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?