Abstract:Businesses are increasingly declaring their operations to be "carbon neutral" or "net-zero". But how real are these claims? We investigated the climate mitigation efforts of the eight leading universities in Australia and discovered that the actual emission reductions lag behind the net-zero rhetoric. In the last ten years, most universities increased energy consumption, while reported emissions plateaued. The energy consumption and greenhouse gas emissions of Group-of-Eight (Go8) universities were influenced by size and population growth, climate of the campus location, and energy efficiencies. The Go8 universities experienced, on average, a 25% increase in student numbers in the last decade, and most increased their energy consumption. However, Scope 1 (direct emissions) and Scope 2 (emissions from electricity consumption) remained stable for most universities from 2011 to 2019 and decreased on a per-capita basis, indicating some level of improved efficiencies. Almost all Go8 universities have net-zero commitments and aim to achieve this by similar measures: power purchase agreements (PPAs) for electricity consumption, and carbon offsets for remaining emissions. Most universities lack a strategy for direct or measurable targets regarding energy or emissions reductions along their value chain. Unlike the UK or other countries, Australia has no standardised emission reporting requirements for Scope 3 emissions (other indirect emissions). This has led to rudimentary and haphazard reporting, limiting comparability between universities. Only one university had a more complete Scope 3 inventory, and these Scope 3 emissions were five times greater than their combined Scope 1 and 2 emissions, indicating a potential for substantial under-reporting of emissions. This highlights the need for more rigorous, consistent, and sector-specific emissions accounting, especially on indirect emissions, and for an overhaul of net-zero accreditation.

The imperative to reduce carbon emissions in astronomy

The carbon footprint of astronomical observatories

Driving action on the climate crisis through Astronomers for Planet Earth and beyond

Astronomy's climate emissions: Global travel to scientific meetings in 2019

The carbon footprint of astronomical research infrastructures

Scenarios of future annual carbon footprints of astronomical research infrastructures

Low-Energy Astrophysics: Stimulating the Reduction of Energy Consumption in the Next Decade

Astronomy in a Low-Carbon Future

Estimate of the carbon footprint of astronomical research infrastructures

Embedding Climate Change Engagement in Astronomy Education and Research

High altitude dilemmas: Assessing academic air travel reduction measures by comparing reduction potential and willingness

What trade-off for astronomy between greenhouse gas emissions and the societal benefits? A sociological approach

Environmental transition: overview of actions to reduce the environmental footprint of astronomy

Climate Change Task Force Report for the American Astronomical Society

How to Assess the Carbon Footprint of a Large-Scale Physics Project

Emission reduction potentials for academic conference travel

Net-Zero Heroes? Climate Change Mitigation Efforts and Strategies across Australian Group-of-Eight Universities

How scientists can reduce their carbon footprint

The Ecological Impact of High-performance Computing in Astrophysics

"My Earth" Astrophysics and Planets -- a serious game to build low carbon scenarios in the astronomy academic community