Abstract:Completely randomized experiments have been the gold standard for drawing causal inference because they can balance all potential confounding on average. However, they may suffer from unbalanced covariates for realized treatment assignments. Rerandomization, a design that rerandomizes the treatment assignment until a prespecified covariate balance criterion is met, has recently got attention due to its easy implementation, improved covariate balance and more efficient inference. Researchers have then suggested to use the treatment assignments that minimize the covariate imbalance, namely the optimally balanced design. This has caused again the long-time controversy between two philosophies for designing experiments: randomization versus optimal and thus almost deterministic designs. Existing literature argued that rerandomization with overly balanced observed covariates can lead to highly imbalanced unobserved covariates, making it vulnerable to model misspecification. On the contrary, rerandomization with properly balanced covariates can provide robust inference for treatment effects while sacrificing some efficiency compared to the ideally optimal design. In this paper, we show it is possible that, by making the covariate imbalance diminishing at a proper rate as the sample size increases, rerandomization can achieve its ideally optimal precision that one can expect with perfectly balanced covariates, while still maintaining its robustness. We further investigate conditions on the number of covariates for achieving the desired optimality. Our results rely on a more delicate asymptotic analysis for rerandomization. The derived theory for rerandomization provides a deeper understanding of its large-sample property and can better guide its practical implementation. Furthermore, it also helps reconcile the controversy between randomized and optimal designs in an asymptotic sense.

MODE: Minimax Optimal Deterministic Experiments for Causal Inference in the Presence of Covariates

A robust and efficient approach to causal inference based on sparse sufficient dimension reduction

Causal Inference with High-dimensional Discrete Covariates

Inference on Average Treatment Effect under Minimization and Other Covariate-Adaptive Randomization Methods

Minimax designs for causal effects in temporal experiments with treatment habituation

High Precision Causal Model Evaluation with Conditional Randomization

Matching as Nonparametric Preprocessing for Reducing Model Dependence in Parametric Causal Inference

Sufficient dimension reduction for average causal effect estimation

On Estimating Regression-Based Causal Effects Using Sufficient Dimension Reduction

Asymptotic Theory of the Best-Choice Rerandomization using the Mahalanobis Distance

Rerandomization with Diminishing Covariate Imbalance and Diverging Number of Covariates

What can the millions of random treatments in nonexperimental data reveal about causes?

Experimental Design For Causal Inference Through An Optimization Lens

Penalized Regression Adjusted Causal Effect Estimates in High Dimensional Randomized Experiments

Impact of Sufficient Dimension Reduction in Nonparametric Estimation of Causal Effect

Inference for Two-stage Experiments under Covariate-Adaptive Randomization

An Efficient Matching Method for Causal Inference Using Sufficient Dimension Reduction

Sequential Covariate-Adjusted Randomization Via Hierarchically Minimizing Mahalanobis Distance and Marginal Imbalance.

An Optimal Method for Covariate Balancing and Its Properties

A Comparison of Methods of Inference in Randomized Experiments from a Restricted Set of Allocations

Optimization-based Causal Estimation from Heterogenous Environments