Abstract:Objective:To explore the diagnostic value of motion pain induction test for early knee osteoarthritis.Methods:A cross-sectional study was conducted and the data came from The Project of Health Management of Knee osteoarthritis in Community in Hangzhou in 2018, and a total number of 1 816 people were included which were divided into normal group ( n=530), early group ( n=534) and middle-late group ( n=752) by not sick, sick while Kellgren-Lawrence (KL) ≤Ⅱ and sick while KL>Ⅱ starting, squatting, walking up and down stairs and doing housework were included in the test, and the statistical indicators included age, gender and pain scores (visual analogue scale, VAS). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were mapped after the correlation analysis to obtain the cut-off points and compare their values of area under the curve (AUC). The confounders which included age and gender were corrected by propensity score matching (PSM) and the balance test is consistent with P>0.05 after the PSM. The Kappa analysis was used to verify the consistency of two diagnostic methods. Results:The age of normal, early and medial-late groupwas 67.39±7.43, 67.41±9.52, 71.55±9.87. And the gender distribution of three groups was (238 male, 292 female), (209 male, 325 female), (357 male, 395 female). There was no heterogeneitybetween the normal group and early group in distribution ( P>0.05) while there was heterogeneity between the early and medial-late group ( t=-0.034, P<0.05; χ2=8.80, P<0.05). The VAS scoresof starting pain in three groups was 0.16±0.37,2.70±1.69, 3.68±2.10. The VAS scoresof squatting pain was 0.42±0.49, 2.88±1.44, 4.01±2.08. The VAS scoresof up and down stair pain was 0.47±0.50, 2.87±1.38, 3.82±1.98. The VAS scoresof housework pain was 0.14±0.35, 2.15±1.40, 3.45±2.09. The VAS scoresofmaximum pain was 0.51±0.50, 3.59±1.48, 4.68±2.01. And there was significant difference between normal and early groupin all kinds of pain ( t=-33.81; t=-37.25; t=-37.66; t=-32.07; t=-45.41; P<0.05). The difference between early and medial-late group in all type of pain was significant ( t=-8.93; t=-10.84; t=-9.56; t=-12.52; t=-10.64; P<0.05). The results were similar after adjusting for confounders except for the pain of starting ( P>0.05). The results of ROC curve between normal and early group showed the maximum pain's AUC point was 0.98 and larger than others, and its cut-off point was 1. After adjusted, the results of ROC curve between early and medial-late group showed the maximum pain's AUC point was 0.72 which was larger than others and cut-off point was 4. For the AUC of ROC curve between early and medial-late groupwas lower, Kappa-test was used, and the Kappa point of two diagnostic methods was 0.41 ( P<0.05). Conclusion:The maximum of pain score in pain dimension>1 and ≤ 4 could be preliminarily diagnosed as early KOA. It had high value in separating early KOA from normal people and approximately similar to X-ray, and the value of identifying early and mid-late KOAwas moderateas well as the moderate consistency with KL stage. Comprehensive judgment of imaging examination should be improved when conditions are available.

Characteristics of musculoskeletal ultrasound versus X-ray in their differential diagnosis of knee osteoarthritis

Value of high-frequency ultrasound and X-ray in diagnosing knee osteoarthritis: a comparative study

[Study on the Correlation Between Knee Osteoarthritis Imaging and Effects of Arthroscope].

Diagnostic value of ultrasonography in knee osteoarthritis: A systematic review

The Investigation of the Application Value of Musculoskeletal Ultrasound in the Diagnosis and Conservative Treatment of Knee Osteoarthritis

The Comparison of the Diagnostic Value for Osteoarthritis of the Knee with High-frequency Ultrasound Examination and Arthroscopy

A study on evaluation of knee osteoarthritis with MRI and comparing it with CT scan, high resolution USG and conventional radiography

The diagnostic value of motion pain induction test for early knee osteoarthritis

Diagnostic Value of Ultrasonography in Determination of Knee Joint Pathologies with Comparison to MRI

Role of Ultrasonography in Knee Osteoarthritis

Imaging of knee osteoarthritis: a review of multimodal diagnostic approach

Concordance of Ultrasound and Dual-Energy CT in Diagnosing Gouty Arthritis in the Knee Joint: A Retrospective Observational Study

Musculoskeletal Ultrasound in Rheumatological Diseases

Ultrasonographic Features of Knee Osteoarthritis in Chinese Population

The Utility of a Community-Based Knee Ultrasound in Detecting Meniscal Tears: A Retrospective Analysis in Comparison with MRI

Effects of therapeutic ultrasound in patients with knee osteoarthritis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Radiomics Analysis Using MR Imaging of Subchondral Bone for Identification of Knee Osteoarthritis

Multimodal Magnetic Resonance Imaging to Diagnose Knee Osteoarthritis under Artificial Intelligence

Ultrasounds outperform magnetic resonance imaging in quantifying meniscal extrusion in patients with knee osteoarthritis

A Meta‐Analysis of Analgesic Effect of Ultrasound Therapy for Patients With Knee Osteoarthritis

Diagnostic value of ultrasound in calcium pyrophosphate deposition disease of the knee joint