Abstract:Background Bibliometric analysis is a quantitative method which applies mathematical and statistical tools to evaluate the inter-relationships and impacts of publications, authors, institutions and countries in a specific research area. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses (SRMAs) are summaries of the best available evidence to address a specific research question via comprehensively literature search, in-depth analysis and synthesis of results. To date, there have been several studies summarizing the publication trends of SRMAs in research specialties, however, none has conducted specifically in ophthalmology. The purpose of this study is to establish the scientometric landscape of SRMAs published in the field of ophthalmology over time. Methods We retrieved relevant ophthalmological SRMAs and the corresponding bibliometric parameters during 2000 to 2020 from Web of Science Core Collection. Bibliometric analysis was performed using bibliometrix package. Pre-registration and guideline compliance of each article was independently assessed by two investigators. Results A total of 2,660 SRMAs were included, and the average annual growth rate was 21.26%. China and the United States were the most productive countries, while Singapore was the country with the highest average citations per document. Wong TY was not only the most productive, but also the most frequently cited author. The most productive affiliation was National University of Singapore ( n = 236). Systematic reviews and meta-analyses output in most subspecialties had steadily increased with retina/vitreous ( n = 986), glaucoma ( n = 411) and cornea/external diseases ( n = 303) constantly as the most dominant fields. Rates of pre-registration and guideline compliance had dramatically increased over time, with 20.0 and 63.5% of article being pre-registered and reported guideline in 2020, respectively. However, SRMAs published on ophthalmology journals tended to be less frequently pre-registered and guideline complied than those on non-ophthalmology journals (both p < 0.001). Conclusion The annual output of SRMAs has been rapidly increasing over the past two decades. China and the United States were the most productive countries, whereas Singapore has the most prolific and influential scholar and institution. Raising awareness and implementation of SRMAs pre-registration and guideline compliance is still necessary to ensure quality, especially for ophthalmology journals.

Evaluating Research Activity and NIH-Funding Among Academic Ophthalmologists Using Relative Citation Ratio

Factors Associated with Research Productivity and National Institutes of Health Funding in Academic Otology

Evaluation of Research Productivity Among Academic Cornea, External Diseases, and Refractive Surgery Ophthalmologists Using the Relative Citation Ratio

Analysis of Research Activity Among Ophthalmology Fellows

Investigating Academic Graph‐Based Factors Behind Funding Success in National Institutes of Health

A bibliometric analysis of academic publication and NIH funding.

Evaluating Funding for Authors Achieving High Citations vs. Online Popularity

Academic Productivity in Ophthalmology and Its Correlation to National Economic Indicators Among the OECD Countries: A Bibliometric Analysis

Academic Metrics and Demographics and NIH Grant Funding in Interventional Radiology

Mapping Research Trends of Chronic Ocular Graft-Versus-host Disease from 2009 to 2020: a Bibliometric Analysis

Highly cited publication performance in the ophthalmology category in the Web of Science database: a bibliometric analysis

The Relative Citation Ratio: Evaluating a New Measure of Scientific Influence Among Academic Sports Medicine Surgeons

Utilizing a composite citation index for evaluating clinical ophthalmology research: insights into gender, nationality, and self-citation among top ophthalmology researchers

A bibliometric analysis of systematic reviews and meta-analyses in ophthalmology

Hotspots and trends in ophthalmology in recent 5 years: Bibliometric analysis in 2017–2021

Assessing the Relationship between Radiology Department Research Funding and Institutional Community Inclusion and Investment

The Role of Positive and Negative Citations in Scientific Evaluation

335 Federal Research Funding Trends for Cerebrovascular Neurosurgeons: The Decline of the Cerebrovascular Surgeon-Scientist?

Utilizing Relative Citation Ratio to Compare Academic Productivity by Gender in Plastic Surgery

Bibliometric analysis of the 3-year trends (2018-2021) in literature on artificial intelligence in ophthalmology and vision sciences

Bibliometric analysis of research relating to refractive cataract surgery over a 20-year period: from 2003 to 2022