Trimodal therapy effect on survival in urothelial vs non‐urothelial bladder cancer

Mario de Angelis,Andrea Baudo,Carolin Siech,Letizia Maria Ippolita Jannello,Francesco Di Bello,Jordan A. Goyal,Zhe Tian,Nicola Longo,Ottavio de Cobelli,Felix K. H. Chun,Fred Saad,Shahrokh F. Shariat,Luca Carmignani,Giorgio Gandaglia,Marco Moschini,Francesco Montorsi,Alberto Briganti,Pierre I. Karakiewicz
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.16333
2024-03-19
BJU International
Abstract:Objective To address cancer‐specific mortality free‐survival (CSM‐FS) differences in patients with urothelial carcinoma of the urinary bladder (UCUB) vs non‐UCUB who underwent trimodal therapy (TMT), according to organ confined (OC: T2N0M0) vs non‐organ confined (NOC: T3–4NanyM0 or TanyN1–3M0) clinical stages. Patients and Methods Within the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database (2004–2020), we identified patients with cT2–T4N0–N3M0 bladder cancer treated with TMT, defined as the combination of transurethral resection of bladder tumour, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy. Temporal trends described TMT use over time. Kaplan–Meier plots and multivariable Cox regression (MCR) models addressed CSM in UCUB vs non‐UCUB according to OC vs NOC stages. Results Of 5130 assessable TMT‐treated patients, 425 (8%) harboured non‐UCUB vs 4705 (92%) who had UCUB. The TMT rates increased for patients with OC UCUB from 92.4% to 96.8% (estimated annual percentage change of 0.4%, P
urology & nephrology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?