Abstract:Accurate prediction of binding free energies is critical to streamlining the drug development and protein design process. With the advent of GPU acceleration, absolute alchemical methods, which simulate the removal of ligand electrostatics and van der Waals interactions with the protein, have become routinely accessible and provide a physically rigorous approach that enables full consideration of flexibility and solvent interaction. However, standard explicit solvent simulations are unable to model protonation or electronic polarization changes upon ligand transfer from water to the protein interior, leading to inaccurate prediction of binding affinities for charged molecules. Here, we perform extensive simulation totaling ∼540 μs to benchmark the impact of modeling conditions on predictive accuracy for absolute alchemical simulations. Binding to urokinase plasminogen activator (UPA), a protein frequently overexpressed in metastatic tumors, is evaluated for a set of 10 inhibitors with extended flexibility, highly charged character, and titratable properties. We demonstrate that the alchemical simulations can be adapted to utilize the MBAR/PBSA method to improve the accuracy upon incorporating electronic polarization, highlighting the importance of polarization in alchemical simulations of binding affinities. Comparison of binding energy prediction at various protonation states indicates that proper electrostatic setup is also crucial in binding affinity prediction of charged systems, prompting us to propose an alternative binding mode with protonated ligand phenol and Hid-46 at the binding site, a testable hypothesis for future experimental validation.The Supporting Information is available free of charge at <a class="ext-link" href="/doi/10.1021/acs.jctc.0c01305?goto=supporting-info">https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.jctc.0c01305</a>.Discussion of apparent binding free energies with one titratable group, MBAR/PBSA accuracy, binding free energy predictions for all conditions, illustration of restraint definitions, decharging and VDW free energies from alchemical simulations, illustration of the UPA active site with ligand, B-Factor, GAFF and GAFF2 structure analysis, and correlation plots of binding affinity for ligand restraints, differing protonation states, with and without outlier and with MBAR/PBSA postprocessing (<a class="ext-link" href="/doi/suppl/10.1021/acs.jctc.0c01305/suppl_file/ct0c01305_si_001.pdf">PDF</a>)This article has not yet been cited by other publications.

The Jarzynski binding free energy can effectively rank ligand-protein affinities in inadequate samplings

On achieving high accuracy and reliability in the calculation of relative protein–ligand binding affinities

Free Energy Calculation of Single Molecular Interaction Using Jarzynski’s Identity Method:The Case of HIV-1 Protease Inhibitor System

Hit Identification and Binding Mode Predictions by Rigorous Free Energy Simulations

Interplay Between Binding Affinity and Kinetics in Protein–protein Interactions

Fast Free Energy Estimates from Λ-Dynamics with Bias-Updated Gibbs Sampling

Validation of the Alchemical Transfer Method for the Estimation of Relative Binding Affinities of Molecular Series

Calculation of Absolute Protein-Ligand Binding Affinity Using Path and Endpoint Approaches

Fast and accurate predictions of binding free energies using MM-PBSA and MM-GBSA

Ensemble-Based Thermodynamics of the Fuzzy Binding between Intrinsically Disordered Proteins and Small-Molecule Ligands

Equilibrium and Non-equilibrium Ensemble Methods for Accurate, Precise and Reproducible Absolute Binding Free Energy Calculations

A Computational Analysis of the Binding Affinities of FKBP12 Inhibitors Using the MM‐PB/SA Method

Binding Affinities for A Series of Selective Inhibitors of Gelatinase-A Using Molecular Dynamics with A Linear Interaction Energy Approach

More is Simpler: Decomposition of Ligand-Binding Affinity for Proteins Being Disordered

Large scale free energy calculations for blind predictions of protein-ligand binding: the D3R Grand Challenge 2015

Predictions Of Binding Of A Diverse Set Of Ligands To Gelatinase-A By A Combination Of Molecular Dynamics And Continuum Solvent Models

Comparative studies of 14 binding free energies scoring functions

Binding free energy of protein/ligand complexes calculated using dissociation Parallel Cascade Selection Molecular Dynamics and Markov state model

Estimating the Roles of Protonation and Electronic Polarization in Absolute Binding Affinity Simulations

Prediction of protein–ligand binding affinity by free energy simulations: assumptions, pitfalls and expectations

Impact of Interfacial High-Density Water Layer on Accurate Estimation of Adsorption Free Energy by Jarzynski's Equality.