Improving on bold play when the gambler is restricted

Jason Schweinsberg
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1239/jap/1118777173
IF: 1.1161
2005-06-01
Journal of Applied Probability
Abstract:Suppose that a gambler starts with a fortune in (0,1) and wishes to attain a fortune of 1 by making a sequence of bets. Assume that whenever the gambler stakes an amount s , the gambler's fortune increases by s with probability w and decreases by s with probability 1 − w , where w < 1⁄2. Dubins and Savage showed that the optimal strategy, which they called ‘bold play’, is always to bet min{ f , 1 − f }, where f is the gambler's current fortune. Here we consider the problem in which the gambler may stake no more than l at one time. We show that the bold strategy of always betting min{l, f , 1 − f } is not optimal if l is irrational, extending a result of Heath, Pruitt, and Sudderth.
statistics & probability
What problem does this paper attempt to address?