National Registry Insights on Genetic Aortopathies and Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Interventions

Jorge L. Gomez-Mayorga,Sai Divya Yadavalli,Sara Allievi,Sophie X. Wang,Vinamr Rastogi,Sabrina Straus,Tim J. Mandigers,James H. Black,Sara L. Zettervall,Marc L. Schermerhorn
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2024.05.002
IF: 4.86
2024-05-12
Journal of Vascular Surgery
Abstract:CONCLUSIONS: TEVAR for GA patients appeared to be initially safe with similar odds for in-hospital complications, in-hospital reinterventions, and perioperative mortality, as well as similar hazards for 5-year mortality compared with non-GA patients. However, GA patients had higher 2-year reintervention rates. Future studies should assess long-term durability after TEVAR compared with the recommended open repair to appropriately weigh risks and benefits of endovascular treatment in GA patients.
surgery,peripheral vascular disease
What problem does this paper attempt to address?