The role of multi-category subsidies in cultivated land transfer decision-making of rural households in China: Synergy or trade-off?

Weiwen Wang,Ying Wang,Yang Shen,Lisha Cheng,Jianjun Qiao
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2023.103096
IF: 4.732
2023-09-27
Applied Geography
Abstract:The potential interactions (synergies or trade-offs) of multi-category subsidies implemented simultaneously in rural areas dedicated to promoting rural development and human well-being remain unclear, particularly in relation to cultivated land transfer decision-making to address the prevalent issue of idle or abandoned cultivated lands. This study presented a theoretical framework and an empirical examination of data from 1587 households to explore the causal pathway and differentiated roles of livelihood capitals and three categories of subsidies (i.e., comprehensive agricultural subsidy (CAS), conversion of cropland to forest program subsidy (CCFPS), and other financial transfer payments (OFTP)) in cultivated land transfer decision-making. Our findings suggested that livelihood capital accumulation facilitates cultivated land out-flow, albeit unevenly across households receiving different subsidies. Multi-category subsidies moderate the relationship between livelihood capitals and cultivated land transfer decision-making, with CAS being vital for sustaining agricultural production and prompting land inflow, while CCFPS and OFTP have opposite effects. Ultimately, this research highlighted the trade-off and even offsetting roles of multi-category subsidies, calling for personalized subsidies based on household cultivated land conditions and planting willingness.
geography
What problem does this paper attempt to address?