Abstract:Background: Pain is one of the most common and troublesome symptoms of cancer. Although potential positive effects of acupuncture-point stimulation (APS) on cancer pain have been observed, knowledge regarding the selection of the optimal APS remains unclear because of a lack of evidence from head-to-head randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Objective: This study aimed to carry out a network meta-analysis to compare the efficacy and safety of different APS combined with opioids in treating moderate to severe cancer pain and rank these methods for practical consideration. Methods: A comprehensive search of eight electronic databases was conducted to obtain RCTs involving different APS combined with opioids for moderate to severe cancer pain. Data were screened and extracted independently using predesigned forms. The quality of RCTs was appraised with the Cochrane Collaboration risk-of-bias tool. The primary outcome was the total pain relief rate. Secondary outcomes were the total incidence of adverse reactions, the incidence of nausea and vomiting, and the incidence of constipation. We applied a frequentist, fixed-effect network meta-analysis model to pool effect sizes across trials using rate ratios (RR) with their 95% confidence intervals (CI). Network meta-analysis was performed using Stata/SE 16.0. Results: We included 48 RCTs, which consisted of 4,026 patients, and investigated nine interventions. A network meta-analysis showed that a combination of APS and opioids was superior in relieving moderate to severe cancer pain and reducing the incidence of adverse reactions such as nausea, vomiting, and constipation compared to opioids alone. The ranking of total pain relief rates was as follows: fire needle (surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) = 91.1%), body acupuncture (SUCRA = 85.0%), point embedding (SUCRA = 67.7%), auricular acupuncture (SUCRA = 53.8%), moxibustion (SUCRA = 41.9%), transcutaneous electrical acupoint stimulation (TEAS) (SUCRA = 39.0%), electroacupuncture (SUCRA = 37.4%), and wrist–ankle acupuncture (SUCRA = 34.1%). The ranking of total incidence of adverse reactions was as follows: auricular acupuncture (SUCRA = 23.3%), electroacupuncture (SUCRA = 25.1%), fire needle (SUCRA = 27.2%), point embedding (SUCRA = 42.6%), moxibustion (SUCRA = 48.2%), body acupuncture (SUCRA = 49.8%), wrist–ankle acupuncture (SUCRA = 57.8%), TEAS (SUCRA = 76.3%), and opioids alone (SUCRA = 99.7%). Conclusions: APS seemed to be effective in relieving cancer pain and reducing opioid-related adverse reactions. Fire needle combined with opioids may be a promising intervention to reduce moderate to severe cancer pain as well as reduce opioid-related adverse reactions. However, the evidence was not conclusive. More high-quality trials investigating the stability of evidence levels of different interventions on cancer pain must be conducted. Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/#searchadvanced, identifier CRD42022362054.

Exploring the Rules of Related Parameters in Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation for Cancer Pain Based on Data Mining

Research on Electroacupuncture Parameters for Cancer Pain Based on Data Mining

Non-invasive Brain Stimulation Interventions for Management of Chronic Central Neuropathic Pain: a Scoping Review Protocol

Preliminary Analysis of Common Parameters for Acupuncture Treatment of Cancer Pain

Evaluating the Analgesic Effect and Advantage of Transcutaneous Electrical Acupoint Stimulation Combined with Opioid Drugs for Moderate to Severe Cancer-Related Pain: a Study Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial.

Clinical analysis of electroacupuncture and multiple acupoint stimulation in relieving cancer pain in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma

Transcutaneous electrical acupoint stimulation for alleviating pain in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer

Data Mining Analysis Reveals Key Acupoints and Meridians for the Treatment of Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy.

Transcutaneous Electrical Acupoint Stimulation for Moderate to Severe Pain in Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial

Transcutaneous Electrical Acupoint Stimulation for Cancer-Related Pain Management in Patients Receiving Chronic Opioid Therapy: a Randomized Clinical Trial

Clinical rules of Acupoint selection for cancer pain opioid-induced constipation based on journal literature data mining: A systematic review

Rules of acupoint selection in treatment of cancer-related insomnia with acupuncture and moxibustion based on data mining technology

Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation in Relieving Neuropathic Pain: Basic Mechanisms and Clinical Applications

Efficacy and safety of acupuncture-point stimulation combined with opioids for the treatment of moderate to severe cancer pain: a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Neurobiological mechanisms of TENS-induced analgesia

Advancements in Research on Transcutaneous Electrical Acupoint Stimulation for Alleviating Pelvic Pain in Women

Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation in Rodent Models of Neuropathic Pain: A Meta-Analysis

[Acupoint Selection for Cancer Pain: Based on Current Evidence and Delphi Method].

Transcutaneous Auricular Vagus Nerve Stimulation for Managing Pain: A Scoping Review

Comparison Between Therapeutic Effects of Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation with the Frequency of 2 Hz and 100 Hz on Chronic Inflammatory Pain in Rats

Research on electroacupuncture parameters for knee osteoarthritis based on data mining