Social and clinical vulnerability in stroke and STEMI management during the COVID-19 pandemic: a registry-based study

Lesaine,E.,Francis,F.,Domecq,S.,Miganeh-Hadi,S.,Sevin,F.,Sibon,I.,Rouanet,F.,Pradeau,C.,Coste,P.,Cetran,L.,Vandentorren,S.,Saillour,F.,AVICOVID group,Faucheux,Leca Radu,Seignolles,Chazalon,Dan,Lucas,Peron,Wong-So,Martinez,Nocon,Hostyn,Papin,Bordier,Casenave,Maillard,Ondze,Argacha,Tidahy,Ferraton,Mostefai,Demasles,Hubrecht,Bakpa,Bartou,Bannier,Bernady,Ellie,Higue,Marnat,Berge,Goze-Dupuy,Lavocat,Senis,Delonglee,Darraillans,Mokni,Bataille,Lorendeau,Eclancher,Trogoff,Chartroule,Touchard,Leyral,Ngounou,Scouarnec,Orcival,Goulois,Heydel,Tahon,Py,Bidian,Fabre,Cherhabil,Baha,Fort,Maisonnave,Verhoeven,Claveries,Ansart,Lefevre,Liepa,Lacrouts,Coustere,Fournier,Jarnier,Delarche,Banos,Marque,Karsenty,Perron,Leymarie,Hassan,Casteigt,Larnaudie,Combes,Laplace
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2023-073933
IF: 3.006
2024-01-04
BMJ Open
Abstract:Objective This study aims to evaluate whether the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic resulted in a deterioration in the quality of care for socially and/or clinically vulnerable stroke and ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients. Design Two cohorts of STEMI and stroke patients in the Aquitaine neurocardiovascular registry. Setting Six emergency medical services, 30 emergency units, 14 hospitalisation units and 11 catheterisation laboratories in the Aquitaine region in France. Participants This study involved 9218 patients (6436 stroke and 2782 STEMI patients) in the neurocardiovascular registry from January 2019 to August 2020. Primary outcome measures Care management times in both cohorts: first medical contact-to-procedure time for the STEMI cohort and emergency unit admission-to-imaging time for the stroke cohort. Associations between social (deprivation index) and clinical (age >65 years, neurocardiovascular history) vulnerabilities and care management times were analysed using multivariate linear mixed models, with an interaction on the time period (pre-wave, per-wave and post-first COVID-19 wave). Results The first medical contact procedure time was longer for elderly (p<0.001) and 'very socially disadvantaged' (p=0.003) STEMI patients, with no interaction regarding the COVID-19 period (age, p=0.54; neurocardiovascular history, p=0.70; deprivation, p=0.64). We found no significant association between vulnerabilities and the admission imaging time for stroke patients, and no interaction with respect to the COVID-19 period (age, p=0.81; neurocardiovascular history, p=0.34; deprivation, p=0.95). Conclusions This study revealed pre-existing inequalities in care management times for vulnerable STEMI and stroke patients; however, these inequalities were neither accentuated nor reduced during the first COVID-19 wave. Measures implemented during the crisis did not alter the structured emergency pathway for these patients. Trial registration number NCT04979208
medicine, general & internal
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
### Problems the paper attempts to solve This paper aims to evaluate whether the first wave of the COVID - 19 pandemic led to a deterioration in the quality of care for socially and/or clinically vulnerable stroke and ST - segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients. Specifically, the study focuses on the following aspects: 1. **Care management time**: The study analyzed the care management time of two cohorts (STEMI and stroke patients) in different time periods (before the pandemic, during the pandemic, and after the pandemic). For STEMI patients, the main focus was on the time from first medical contact to treatment; for stroke patients, the main focus was on the time from admission to the emergency department to the start of imaging examination. 2. **Association between social and clinical vulnerability**: The study explored the relationship between social vulnerability (measured by the deprivation index) and clinical vulnerability (such as being over 65 years old, having a history of neuro - cardiovascular diseases, etc.) and care management time, and analyzed the changes in these relationships in different time periods. 3. **Impact of the COVID - 19 pandemic**: The study specifically focused on whether the COVID - 19 pandemic exacerbated the care inequality of these vulnerable patients, or whether any improvement measures played a role during the pandemic. ### Main conclusions - **Care management time**: The study found that although the access and use of the care system changed during the COVID - 19 pandemic, the acute care management time for socially or clinically vulnerable patients did not deteriorate. - **Social and clinical vulnerability**: For STEMI patients, the care management time for elderly patients and those in extreme poverty was longer before and after the pandemic, but this difference did not change significantly during the pandemic. For stroke patients, no significant association was found between social and clinical vulnerability and the time from admission to the emergency department to imaging examination. - **Impact of the pandemic**: The study results indicate that although the pandemic had an impact on the care system, these impacts did not significantly change the care pathways for socially or clinically vulnerable patients. ### Methods - **Study design and population**: The study used data from two retrospective cohorts registered in the Aquitaine region of France from January 1, 2019 to August 31, 2020, including 6,436 stroke patients and 2,782 STEMI patients. - **Data collection**: The data included patients' sociodemographic characteristics, clinical characteristics, care utilization, acute care management quality, and care structure characteristics. - **Statistical analysis**: Multivariate linear mixed models were used to analyze the impact of social and clinical vulnerability on care management time, and interaction terms for time periods were introduced. ### Discussion - **Interpretation of results**: The study results are consistent with a similar study in Italy, which also did not find an education or deprivation gradient in the time of cardiovascular acute care management. - **Possible reasons**: The STEMI and stroke networks in France are well - defined, well - organized, and highly structured patient - centered clinical pathways improve the quality of care for chronic and acute diseases. In addition, the widespread dissemination of health information by the media during the pandemic may have improved the health literacy of the whole society, thus helping to maintain the effectiveness of the care pathways. In conclusion, the study reveals that during the COVID - 19 pandemic, although there were existing inequalities in the care management time for socially and clinically vulnerable patients, these inequalities were not exacerbated.