Parameterization of Height–Diameter and Crown Radius–Diameter Relationships Across the Globe

Xiang Song,Jinxu Li,Xiaodong Zeng
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jpe/rtae005
2024-02-01
Journal of Plant Ecology
Abstract:Abstract The tree height–diameter at breast height (H–DBH) and crown radius–DBH (CR–DBH) relationships are key for forest carbon/biomass estimation, parameterization in vegetation models and vegetation–atmosphere interactions. Although the H–DBH relationship has been widely investigated on site or regional scales, and a small amount of studies have involved CR–DBH relationships based on plot-level data, few studies have quantitatively verified the universality of these two relationships on a global scale. Accordingly, this study first evaluated the ability of 29 functions to fit the H–DBH and CR–DBH relationships for six different plant functional types (PFTs) on a global scale, based on a global plant trait database. Results showed that most functions were able to capture the H–DBH relationship for tropical PFTs and boreal needleleaf trees relatively accurately, but slightly less so for temperate PFTs and boreal broadleaf trees. For boreal PFTs, the S-shaped Logistic function fitted the H–DBH relationship best, while for temperate PFTs the Chapman–Richards function performed well. For tropical needleleaf trees, the fractional function of DBH could satisfactorily capture the H–DBH relationship, while for tropical broadleaf trees, the Weibull function and a composite function of fractions were the best choices. For CR–DBH, the fitting capabilities of all the functions were comparable for all PFTs except boreal broadleaf trees. The Logistic function performed best for two boreal PFTs and temperate broadleaf trees, but for temperate needleleaf trees and two tropical PFTs, some exponential functions demonstrated higher skill. This work provides a valuable foundation for parameterization improvements in vegetation models, and some clues to forest field investigations.
plant sciences,ecology,forestry
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
### What problem does this paper attempt to solve? This paper aims to address the universality of the tree height-diameter at breast height (H–DBH) and crown radius-diameter at breast height (CR–DBH) relationships on a global scale. Specifically: 1. **Importance of the relationships**: - Tree height (H), diameter at breast height (DBH), and crown radius (CR) are fundamental physical quantities describing tree growth and size, closely related to the biophysical and biochemical processes of ecosystems. - The relationships between these variables are crucial for estimating forest carbon storage/vegetation biomass and play an important role in the parameterization schemes of vegetation models. 2. **Limitations of existing studies**: - Most current studies on H–DBH and CR–DBH relationships are focused on site or regional scales, lacking systematic validation on a global scale. - Existing vegetation models often use uniform simple functional forms and parameters to describe these relationships, which may lead to significant biases. 3. **Research objectives**: - By evaluating 29 different functions, determine their fitting ability for the H–DBH and CR–DBH relationships of six different plant functional types (PFTs) on a global scale. - Provide valuable foundational information for improving the parameterization schemes of vegetation models and offer insights for forest field survey research. ### Main findings - For tropical PFTs and boreal coniferous forests, most functions can accurately capture the H–DBH relationship, but the fitting is slightly worse for temperate PFTs and boreal broadleaf forests. - The Logistic function is most suitable for fitting the H–DBH relationship of boreal PFTs, while the Chapman–Richards function is suitable for temperate PFTs. - The fractional function is suitable for the H–DBH relationship of tropical coniferous forests, while the Weibull function and some composite functions are suitable for tropical broadleaf forests. - For the CR–DBH relationship, except for boreal broadleaf forests, all functions have comparable fitting abilities. The Logistic function fits best for the two boreal PFTs and temperate broadleaf forests, while the exponential function performs better for temperate coniferous forests and the two tropical PFTs. ### Conclusion - By identifying the best-fitting functions, the tree morphology parameterization schemes in vegetation models can be improved, reducing the simulation biases in ecosystem structure (such as tree height, crown area, leaf area index, etc.) and biomass. - Further data collection is needed to consider leaf phenology (evergreen/deciduous) and focus on the prediction accuracy of small individuals to enhance model performance.