Update in Outpatient General Internal Medicine: Practice-Changing Evidence Published in 2023

Majken T Wingo,Carl A Andersen,Shari L Bornstein,Jill M Huber,Jason H Szostek,Mark L Wieland,Majken T. Wingo,Carl A. Andersen,Shari L. Bornstein,Jill M. Huber,Jason H. Szostek,Mark L. Wieland
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjmed.2024.02.017
IF: 5.928
2024-02-01
The American Journal of Medicine
Abstract:The expansive scope of internal medicine can make it challenging for clinicians to stay informed about new literature that changes practice. Guideline updates and synthesis of relevant evidence can facilitate incorporation of advancements into clinical practice. The titles and abstracts from the seven general medicine journals with highest impact factors and relevance to outpatient internal medicine were reviewed by six internal medicine physicians. Coronavirus disease 19 research was excluded. The New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM), The Lancet, Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA), The British Medical Journal (BMJ), Annals of Internal Medicine, JAMA Internal Medicine, and Mayo Clinic Proceedings were reviewed. Additionally, article synopsis collections and databases were evaluated: American College of Physicians Journal Club, NEJM Journal Watch, BMJ Evidence-Based Medicine, McMaster ACCESSSS/DynaMed Evidence Alerts, and Cochrane Reviews. A modified Delphi method was used to gain consensus based on clinical relevance to outpatient internal medicine, potential impact on practice, and strength of evidence. Article qualities and importance were debated until consensus was reached. Clusters of articles pertinent to the same topic were considered together. In total, seven practice-changing articles were included.
medicine, general & internal
What problem does this paper attempt to address?