Abstract:Statistical and dynamical downscaling techniques have been proposed to bridge the gaps between coarse-scale and generally biased climate model outputs and the point-scale requirements of impact model inputs. Amongst the various statistical approaches, empirical downscaling methods are the most commonly used due to their ease of implementation. Several empirical downscaling approaches have been proposed and need to be assessed as to which method contributes (or not) to the overall climate change uncertainty. Accordingly, this work aims at assessing the uncertainty of six empirical downscaling methods in quantifying the hydrological impact of climate change over two North American river basins under different climate conditions. The six empirical downscaling methods are grouped into change factor (two methods) and bias correction (four methods) approaches. The uncertainty related to the choice of an empirical downscaling method is compared to that associated with the choice of climate simulation, through the use of two Regional Climate Models (RCMs) driven by three different General Circulation Models (GCMs), totaling four RCM simulations, taken from the NARCCAP inter-comparison project. The future (2041-2065) hydrological regimes simulated with an empirical lumped hydrology model (HSAMI) are compared to the reference period (1971-1995) using a set of hydrology criteria which includes statistics of both mean and extreme values. The results show a large uncertainty envelope associated with the choice of a given empirical downscaling method, as well as for the choice of an RCM simulation. The uncertainty due to empirical downscaling and RCM simulation was more significant in projecting extreme streamflow than in projecting mean flows. Comparing the uncertainty envelope of empirical downscaling methods to the envelope resulting from four RCM simulations indicates that both are similar, even though the latter was slightly larger for some statistics. Finally, the uncertainty linked to the choice of an empirical downscaling approach (change factor vs. bias correction) was much larger than within each type. Overall, this work emphasizes the importance of using several climate projections and empirical downscaling approaches to delineate uncertainty when assessing the climate change impacts on hydrology. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Evaluating downscaled products with expected hydroclimatic co-variances

Assessing Regression‐based Statistical Approaches for Downscaling Precipitation over North America

Climate Change Impact Assessment on Extreme Precipitation Processes: Recent Advances and Shortcomings

An Evaluation of Dynamical Downscaling Methods Used to Project Regional Climate Change

Hydrologic implications of dynamical and statistical approaches to downscaling climate model outputs

Evaluation and application analysis of kilometer-scale convective parameters derived from a statistical downscaling method over Central China

Statistical Downscaling of Daily Precipitation from GCM Output : A Swedish Case Study

Performance and uncertainty evaluation of empirical downscaling methods in quantifying the climate change impacts on hydrology over two North American river basins

Coupling a Markov Chain and Support Vector Machine for At-Site Downscaling of Daily Precipitation

Uncertainty Analysis for Propagation Effects from Statistical Downscaling to Hydrological Modelinguncertainty Analysis for Propagation Effects from Statistical Downscaling to Hydrological Modeling

Statistical Downscaling Based on Dynamically Downscaled Predictors: Application to Monthly Precipitation in Sweden

Climate Variable Downscaling with Conditional Normalizing Flows

Intercomparison of Machine Learning Methods for Statistical Downscaling: The Case of Daily and Extreme Precipitation

Evaluation of a weather generator-based method for statistically downscaling non-stationary climate scenarios for impact assessment at a point scale

Using Statistical Downscaling to Quantify the Gcm-Related Uncertainty in Regional Climate Change Scenarios: A Case Study of Swedish Precipitation

Multi-site Precipitation Downscaling Using a Stochastic Weather Generator

Evaluating the Credibility of Downscaling: Integrating Scale, Trend, Extreme, and Climate Event into a Diagnostic Framework

Multisite and Multivariate GCM Downscaling Using a Distribution-Free Shuffle Procedure for Correlation Reconstruction

Configuration and Intercomparison of Deep Learning Neural Models for Statistical Downscaling

Comparison of statistical downscaling methods for climate change impact analysis on precipitation-driven drought

Downscaling of Weather Generator Parameters to Quantify Hydrological Impacts of Climate Change