Abstract:Purpose Based on 3,775 firm-year observations from 2009 to 2013 using publicly available disclosure data for Korean listed firms, this study examines whether and how firm-level governance characteristics are associated with investment in internal auditing proxied by compensation and the number of statutory internal auditors. Design/methodology/approach The authors investigate the association between governance characteristics and investment in internal auditing proxied by compensation and the number of statutory internal auditors. Findings The authors find that firms with greater ownership of the largest shareholders and with a higher proportion of outside directors invest more in internal auditing. These results indicate that firms with higher incentive and demand for monitoring are more likely to invest more in internal auditing. The authors further find that the positive effect of the largest shareholder ownership (board independence) on investment in internal auditing is attenuated in firms with greater board independence (ownership of the largest shareholders) suggesting that the complementary effect of the two governance mechanisms associated with internal auditing weakens as they function simultaneously. Research limitations/implications The results provide regulators and investors with a clear picture of the governance characteristics of firms associated with investment in internal auditing. The results imply that both the largest shareholders and the outside board of directors play a significant role in resource allocation in internal auditing within a firm. The effect of allocation, however, can be attenuated contingent upon the combined characteristics of governance mechanisms. Originality/value Using large amounts of public archival data, this study adds to the extant literature on firm characteristics associated with investment in internal auditing. This study also contributes to the literature by expanding the scope of research on executive compensation to the locus of statutory internal auditors.

Do Audit Efforts Reduce Stock Price Crash Risk? The Role of Corporate Governance

Internal Control and Stock Price Crash Risk: Evidence from China

Perceived Audit Quality, State Ownership, and Stock Price Delay: Evidence from China

Audit Effort and Stock Price Crash Risk

The External Governance Effect of Government Auditing:Evidence from Firms' Stock Price Crash Risk

Audit committee accounting financial expertise and stock price crash risk

The self-contagion effect of a stock crash on the market response of the auditor's other client

Impact of Auditor Turnover on Stock Price Crash Risk: Insights from China's Capital Market

Foreign Investors, External Monitoring, and Stock Price Crash Risk

Corporate social responsibility and stock-price crash risk: test of regulation mechanism based on institutional ownership and internal control

The Effect of KAMs Disclosure in the Extended Audit Report on Managerial Bad News Hoarding Behavior and Stock Price Crash Risk: The Role of Audit Firm Characteristics

Critical audit matters and stock price crash risk

Stock price crash risk and auditor-client contracting

Corporate Social Responsibility, Corporate Governance and Earnings Quality: Evidence from Korea

Investment in internal auditing and governance characteristics

Corporate tax avoidance and stock price crash risk: the moderating effects of corporate governance

Accounting Quality and Audit Attributes on the Stock Price Crashes in an Emerging Market

Capital Market Consequences of Audit Office Size: Evidence from Stock Price Crash Risk

Corporate Social Responsibility, Audit Committee Expertise, and Financial Reporting: Empirical Evidence from Korea

The Impact of ESG Performance on Stock Price Crash Risk: A Study Based on the Perspective of Auditor Opinion Influence

Tax Avoidance, Tax Risk, and Corporate Governance: Evidence from Korea