Abstract:The current large empirical literature on interest rate modeling typically focuses on the in-sample performance and ignores the out-of-sample performance of existing models. We fill the gap in this literature by providing probably the first comprehensive empirical study (to our knowledge) of the out-of-sample performance of a wide variety of popular interest rate models in forecasting the probability density of future interest rates. Out-of-sample density forecasts are important for at least two reasons: (i) out-of-sample analysis helps minimize the data snooping bias due to excessive searching for more complicated models using the same or similar data sets; (ii) the conditional probability density, which completely characterizes the dynamics of an interest rate model, is an essential input to many important financial applications such as pricing fixed-income securities and interest rate risk management. Using a rigorous econometric procedure developed in Hong (2000) for density forecast evaluation, we examine the out-of-sample performance of single-factor diffusion, GARCH, regime-switching and jump-diffusion models. Among other things we focus on the relative importance of (i) linear versus nonlinear drift specification in modeling conditional mean, (ii) level versus GARCH effect in modeling conditional variance, and (iii) regime-switching versus jumps in capturing the tail distribution of interest rate data. Consistent with the in-sample findings in the literature, we find that for out-of-sample density forecasts, it is important to model mean-reversion, conditional heteroskedasticity, and excess kurtosis or heavy-tails of interest rates. Contrary to the in-sample findings, we find that models that perform well in out-of-sample forecasts are those with simpler specifications for all the above three important features. Our results point out the potential risk of overparameterization in the existing interest rate models and show that simplicity is indeed a virtue in out-of-sample applications.

Survey density forecast comparison in small samples

Testing for differences in survey‐based density expectations: A compositional data approach

Density Forecasts in Panel Data Models: A Semiparametric Bayesian Perspective

Equal predictive ability tests based on panel data with applications to OECD and IMF forecasts

Validating Forecasts of the Joint Probability Density of Bond Yields: Can Affine Models Beat Random Walk?

Density forecast combinations: The real‐time dimension

Tests for equal forecast accuracy under heteroskedasticity

Can the Random Walk Model Be Beaten in Out-Of-Sample Density Forecasts? Evidence from Intraday Foreign Exchange Rates

Out-of-Sample Performance of Spot Interest Rate Models

Overprecision in the Survey of Professional Forecasters

Estimating conditional hazard functions and densities with the highly-adaptive lasso

Maximum-Subsampling Test of Equal Predictive Ability

Improving Density Forecast by Modeling Asymmetric Features: an Application to S&P500 Returns.

Correlation‐based tests of predictability

Variability of the Lee–Carter Model Parameters

Comparing Edgeworth Expansion and Saddlepoint Approximation in Assessing the Asymptotic Normality Behavior of A Non-Parametric Estimator for Finite Population Total

Unified treatment of the asymptotics of asymmetric kernel density estimators

Should We Go One Step Further? An Accurate Comparison of One-Step and Two-Step Procedures in a Generalized Method of Moments Framework

Testing Forecast Rationality for Measures of Central Tendency

Evaluating Inflation Forecasts in the Euro Area and the Role of the ECB

Predictive ability tests with possibly overlapping models