Assessment of causal effects of physical activity on neurodegenerative diseases: A Mendelian randomization study

Peng-Fei Wu,Hui Lu,Xiaoting Zhou,Xuchen Liang,Ruizhuo Li,Wan Zhang,Danyang Li,Kun Xia
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jshs.2021.01.008
IF: 13.077
2021-07-01
Journal of Sport and Health Science
Abstract:<h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Background</h3><p>Physical activity has been hypothesized to play a protective role in neurodegenerative diseases. However, effect estimates previously derived from observational studies were prone to confounding or reverse causation.</p><h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Methods</h3><p>We performed a two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis to explore the causal association of accelerometer-measured physical activity with three common neurodegenerative diseases: Alzheimer's disease (AD), Parkinson's disease (PD), and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). We selected genetic instrumental variants reaching genome-wide significance (<em>p</em> &lt; 5 × 10<sup>−8</sup>) from two largest meta-analyses of about 91,100 UK Biobank participants. Summary statistics for AD, PD, and ALS were retrieved from the up-to-date studies in European ancestry led by the international consortia. The random-effect, inverse variance-weighted MR was employed as the primary method, while MR pleiotropy residual sum and outlier (MR-PRESSO), weighted median, and MR-Egger were implemented as sensitivity tests. All statistical analyses were performed using the R software (Version 3.6.1; R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria).</p><h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Results</h3><p>Primary MR analysis and replication analysis utilized 5 and 8 instrumental variables, which explained 0.2% and 0.4% variance in physical activity, respectively. In each set, one variant at 17q21 was significantly associated with PD, and MR sensitivity analyses indicated them it as an outlier and source of heterogeneity and pleiotropy. Primary results with the removal of outlier variants suggested odds ratios (ORs) of neurodegenerative diseases per unit increase in objectively measured physical activity were 1.52 (95% confidence interval (95%CI): 0.88–2.63, <em>p</em> = 0.13) for AD and 3.35 (95%CI: 1.32–8.48, <em>p</em> = 0.01) for PD, while inconsistent results were shown in the replication set for AD (OR = 1.06, 95% CI: 1.01–1.12, <em>p</em> = 0.02) and PD (OR = 0.99, 95%CI: 0.88–0.12, <em>p</em> = 0.97). Similarly, the beneficial effect of physical activity on ALS (OR = 0.51, 95%CI: 0.29–0.91, <em>p</em> = 0.02) was not confirmed in the replication analysis (OR = 0.96, 95%CI: 0.91–1.02, <em>p</em> = 0.22).</p><h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Conclusion</h3><p>Genetically predicted physical activity was not robustly associated with risk of neurodegenerative disorders. Triangulating evidence across other studies is necessary in order to elucidate whether enhancing physical activity is an effective approach in preventing the onset of AD, PD, or ALS.</p>
sport sciences,hospitality, leisure, sport & tourism
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problem that this paper attempts to solve is to evaluate the causal effects of physical activity on neurodegenerative diseases, including Alzheimer's disease (AD), Parkinson's disease (PD), and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). Specifically, the researchers hope to use the Mendelian Randomization (MR) method and genetic variation as an instrumental variable to explore the causal relationship between objectively measured physical activity and these three common neurodegenerative diseases, in order to overcome the influence of confounding factors or reverse causality that may exist in traditional observational studies. ### Research Background - **Neurodegenerative Diseases**: These diseases have become a major global health burden. Although much progress has been made in molecular biology, genetics, and drug research, there are still no effective drugs to stop or slow down the process of neurodegeneration at present. - **The Role of Physical Activity**: Physical activity is considered one of the potentially modifiable risk factors and has attracted extensive research interest in recent years. However, the results of previous observational cohort studies are inconsistent. Emerging studies have shown an association between physical activity and cognitive performance and AD risk, but the evidence is still insufficient. ### Research Objectives - **Evaluate Causal Relationships**: Use the Mendelian Randomization method and genetic variation as an instrumental variable to evaluate the causal effects of objectively measured physical activity on AD, PD, and ALS. - **Overcome Bias**: Traditional observational study designs are easily affected by factors such as sample size limitations, ethical and financial challenges, leading to biases in causal inference. The Mendelian Randomization method can more effectively control confounding factors and reverse causality by using the random allocation characteristics of genetic variation. ### Methods - **Data Sources**: The study used two independent genome - wide association study (GWAS) data sets for primary analysis and replication analysis respectively. These data sets contain genetic variation information of a large number of participants of European ancestry. - **Instrumental Variable Selection**: Single - nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) significantly associated with objectively measured physical activity were selected as instrumental variables, and it was verified that these SNPs meet the three basic assumptions of Mendelian Randomization. - **Statistical Analysis**: The TwoSampleMR and MR - PRESSO packages in R language were used for two - sample Mendelian Randomization analysis, including methods such as inverse - variance weighted method, weighted median method, and MR - Egger regression. ### Results - **Primary Analysis**: In the primary analysis, for every one - unit increase in the genetically predicted physical activity level, the odds ratio (OR) for AD was 1.03 (95% CI: 0.48 - 2.21, p = 0.94), the odds ratio for PD was 0.81 (95% CI: 0.43 - 1.50, p = 0.51), and the odds ratio for ALS was 0.45 (95% CI: 0.27 - 0.74, p < 0.001). - **Replication Analysis**: In the replication analysis, the odds ratio for AD was 1.03 (95% CI: 0.96 - 1.10, p = 0.32), the odds ratio for PD was 1.11 (95% CI: 0.88 - 1.40, p = 0.37), and the odds ratio for ALS was 0.95 (95% CI: 0.90 - 1.00, p = 0.06). - **Sensitivity Analysis**: After removing outlier SNPs, the results for AD and PD were still not significant, while the protective effect of ALS still existed in the primary analysis but was not confirmed in the replication analysis. ### Conclusions - **Main Findings**: Genetically predicted physical activity has no significant causal association with the risks of AD and PD, but has a certain negative correlation with the risk of ALS. However, this result has not been consistently verified in the replication analysis. - **Future Directions**: More research is needed to further verify the impact of physical activity on neurodegenerative diseases, especially in different study designs and populations.