Meeting high-risk patient pain care needs through intensive primary care: a secondary analysis

Giannitrapani,K. F.,Holliday,J. R.,McCaa,M. D.,Stockdale,S.,Bergman,A. A.,Katz,M. L.,Zulman,D. M.,Rubenstein,L. V.,Chang,E. T.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2023-080748
IF: 3.006
2024-01-03
BMJ Open
Abstract:Objective Chronic pain disproportionately affects medically and psychosocially complex patients, many of whom are at high risk of hospitalisation. Pain prevalence among high-risk patients, however, is unknown, and pain is seldom a focus for improving high-risk patient outcomes. Our objective is to (1) evaluate pain frequency in a high-risk patient population and (2) identify intensive management (IM) programme features that patients and providers perceive as important for promoting patient-centred pain care within primary care (PC)-based IM. Design Secondary observational analysis of quantitative and qualitative evaluation data from a multisite randomised PC-based IM programme for high-risk patients. Setting Five integrated local Veterans Affairs (VA) healthcare systems within distinct VA administrative regions. Participants Staff and high-risk PC patients in the VA. Intervention A multisite randomised PC-based IM programme for high-risk patients. Outcome measures (a) Pain prevalence based on VA electronic administrative data and (b) transcripts of interviews with IM staff and patients that mentioned pain. Results Most (70%, 2593/3723) high-risk patients had at least moderate pain. Over one-third (38%, 40/104) of the interviewees mentioned pain or pain care. There were 89 pain-related comments addressing IM impacts on pain care within the 40 interview transcripts. Patient-identified themes were that IM improved communication and responsiveness to pain. PC provider-identified themes were that IM improved workload and access to expertise. IM team member-identified themes were that IM improved pain care coordination, facilitated non-opioid pain management options and mitigated provider compassion fatigue. No negative IM impacts on pain care were mentioned. Conclusions Pain is common among high-risk patients. Future IM evaluations should consider including a focus on pain and pain care, with attention to impacts on patients, PC providers and IM teams.
medicine, general & internal
What problem does this paper attempt to address?