Abstract:Resource-based competition between microorganisms species in continuous culture has been studied extensively both experimentally and theoretically, mostly for bacteria through Monod and Contois “constant yield” models, or for phytoplankton through the Droop “variable yield” models. For homogeneous populations of N bacterial species (Monod) or N phytoplanktonic species (Droop), with one limiting substrate and under constant controls, the theoretical studies indicated that competitive exclusion occurs: only one species wins the competition and displaces all the others (Armstrong and McGehee in Am Nat 115:151, 1980; Hsu and Hsu in SIAM J Appl Math 68:1600–1617, 2008). The winning species expected from theory is the one with the lowest “substrate subsistence concentration” s⋆$$s^{\star }$$, such that its corresponding equilibrium growth rate is equal to the dilution rate D$$D$$. This theoretical result was validated experimentally with phytoplankton (Tilman and Sterner in Oecologia 61(2):197–200, 1984) and bacteria (Hansen and Hubell in Science 207(4438):1491–1493, 1980), and observed in a lake with microalgae (Tilman in Ecology 58(22):338–348, 1977). On the contrary for aggregating bacterial species described by a Contois model, theory predicts coexistence between several species (Grognard et al. in Discrete Contin Dyn Syst Ser B 8(1):73–93, 2007). In this paper we present a generalization of these results by studying a competition between three different types of microorganisms: planktonic (or free) bacteria (represented by a generalized Monod model), aggregating bacteria (represented by a Contois model) and free phytoplankton (represented by a Droop model). We prove that the outcome of the competition is a coexistence between several aggregating bacterial species with a free species of bacteria or phytoplankton, all the other free species being washed out. This demonstration is based mainly on the study of the substrate concentration’s evolution caused by competition; it converges towards the lowest subsistence concentration s⋆$$s^{\star }$$, leading to three different types of competition outcomes: (1) the best free bacteria or phytoplankton competitor excludes all other species; (2) only some aggregating bacterial species coexist in the chemostat; (3) A coexistence between the single best free species, with one or several aggregating species.

The Role of Competition for Resources in Phytoplankton Succession

Phytoplankton competition in deep biomass maximum

Toward a Darwinian Ecology of Plankton

A graphical theory of competition on spatial resource gradients

Responses of Summer Phytoplankton Biomass to Changes in Top-Down Forcing: Insights from Comparative Modelling

Competition patterns among phytoplankton functional groups: How useful are the complex mathematical models?

The Effects of Dynamical Rates on Species Coexistence in a Variable Environment: The Paradox of the Plankton Revisited

Resource Competition During Seasonal Succession Toward Dominance by Cyanobacteria

Vertical distribution and composition of phytoplankton under the influence of an upper mixed layer

Theoretical and Experimental Investigations of Microbial Competition in Continuous Culture

Competition between phytoplankton and bacteria: exclusion and coexistence

Exploitative Competition of Microorganisms for Two Complementary Nutrients in Continuous Cultures

Competition for time: Evidence for an overlooked, diversity‐maintaining competitive mechanism

The evolution of competitive ability for essential resources

Direct competition results from strong competiton for limited resource

A collective phase in resource competition in a highly diverse ecosystem

Dynamics of Phytoplankton Communities under Photoinhibition.

Pattern and Process in Competition

Beyond the Plankton Ecology Group (PEG) Model: Mechanisms Driving Plankton Succession

Emergent competition shapes top-down versus bottom-up control in multi-trophic ecosystems

Dynamics of Two Phytoplankton Speciescompeting for Light and Nutrient with Internal Storage