Abstract:Synopsis In the field of organismal biology, as in much of academia, there is a strong incentive to publish in internationally recognized, highly regarded, English-language journals to promote career advancement. This expectation has created a linguistic hegemony in scientific publishing, whereby scholars for whom English is an additional language face additional barriers to achieving the same scientific recognition as scholars who speak English as a first language. Here, we surveyed the author guidelines of 230 journals in organismal biology with impact factors of 1.5 or greater for linguistically inclusive and equitable practices and policies. We looked for efforts that reflect first steps toward reducing barriers to publication for authors globally, including the presence of statements that encouraged submissions from authors of diverse nationalities and backgrounds, policies regarding manuscript rejection based on perceived inadequacies of the English language, the existence of bias-conscious reviewer practices, whether translation and editing resources or services are available, allowance for non-English abstracts, summaries, or translations, and whether journals offer license options that would permit authors (or other scholars) to translate their work and publish it elsewhere. We also directly contacted a subset of journals to verify whether the information on their author guidelines page accurately reflects their policies and the accommodations they would make. We reveal that journals and publishers have made little progress toward beginning to recognize or reduce language barriers. Counter to our predictions, journals associated with scientific societies did not appear to have more inclusive policies compared to non-society journals. Many policies lacked transparency and clarity, which can generate uncertainty, result in avoidable manuscript rejections, and necessitate additional time and effort from both prospective authors and journal editors. We highlight examples of equitable policies and summarize actions that journals can take to begin to alleviate barriers to scientific publishing.

Impact of articles written in non‐alphabet languages

The Penalty of Containing More Non-English Articles

Publish (in English) or perish: The effect on citation rate of using languages other than English in scientific publications

Language Barriers in Organismal Biology: What Can Journals Do Better?

Statistics hide impact of non-English journals

Academic publishing requires linguistically inclusive policies

Since the Scientific Literature Is Multilingual, Our Models Should Be Too

Impact of Article Language in Multi-Language Medical Journals - a Bibliometric Analysis of Self-Citations and Impact Factor

Addressing Language Inequities in Global Health Science Scholarly Publishing

The manifold costs of being a non-native English speaker in science

Tapping into non-English-language science for the conservation of global biodiversity

Growth of non‐English‐language literature on biodiversity conservation

Non-English language publications in Citation Indexes -- quantity and quality

Being a non-native English speaker in science and medicine

Language inclusion in ecological systematic reviews and maps: Barriers and perspectives

Disadvantages in preparing and publishing scientific papers caused by the dominance of the English language in science: The case of Colombian researchers in biological sciences

Language in Social Science Databases: English Versus Non-English Articles in JSTOR and Scopus

The citation advantage of foreign language references for Chinese social science papers

Evaluation of Author Instructions for Inclusive Language Guidance in Highly Cited English Language Medical Journals

A global AI community requires language-diverse publishing

Linguistic and geographic diversity in research on second language acquisition and multilingualism: An analysis of selected journals