Abstract:We develop a dynamic equilibrium model to derive the endogenous relations among firms’ ownership structures, managerial incentives, and asset returns. Ownership concentration is positively related to managerial incentives (PPS) but is negatively related to its expected stock (dollar) return, and volatility. If initial block ownership is above (below) its steady-state level, block ownership and managerial PPS decrease (increase) over time to their steady-state levels, whereas the expected stock returns, return volatilities, and the price impacts of block trades increase (decrease). The convergence of these variables to their respective steady-state levels is faster for firms that are less productive, that are riskier, and whose earnings are more sensitive to managerial actions. The price impact of block trades is larger in firms that are more productive and smaller in firms whose earnings are more sensitive to managerial actions. Changes in the expected stock return over time are negatively affected by changes in block ownership but positively affected by changes in managerial incentives. Relative to owner-managed firms, more widely owned firms have lower expected stock returns and volatilities, faster dispersion of block ownership, and smaller but more variable price impacts of block trades. Compared with diffusely owned firms, firms with significant blockholdings have lower expected stock returns, higher return volatilities, and less powerful managerial incentives. This paper was accepted by Tomasz Piskorski, finance. Funding: H. W. (H.) Jung and Q. Zeng received an internal research grant (AUD 15,000) in 2015 from the Faculty of Business and Economics at the University of Melbourne. Supplemental Material: The data files and online appendices are available at https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2023.4696 .

Ownership structure, managerial behavior and corporate value

Ownership structure, investment, and the corporate value: An empirical analysis

Ownership Structure,Resolution Mechanism and Control Right of Listed Companies

Reexamining the managerial ownership effect on firm value

Structural models and endogeneity in corporate finance: The link between managerial ownership and corporate performance

Theory of the Firm : Managerial Behavior , Agency Costs and Ownership Structure

Corporate Governance, Ownership Structure and Firm Performance

Ownership Structure, Incentives, and Asset Returns

The choice of organizational form: Vertical financial ownership versus other methods of vertical integration

Harvard Business School; SSRN; National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER); European Corporate Governance Institute (ECGI); Harvard University - Accounting & Control Unit

Equity ownership and the two faces of debt

Executive ownership, corporate value, and executive compensation: A unifying framework

Management ownership and corporate value

Ownership, Incentives and Monitoring

Market Competition Intensity,Managerial Ownership and Corporate Performance——Empirical Evidences from Perspective of Endogeneity

Ownership Structure, Diversification, and Corporate Performance Based on Structural Equation Modeling

The effect of ownership structure on firm performance: Additional evidence

Managerial Entrenchment, Equity Payout and Capital Structure

Managerial Entrenchment, Dividend Policy and Capital Structure

Managerial Entrenchment and Capital Structure: The Effect of Diversification

How Do Various Forms of Ownership Impact Firm Performance?