Abstract:Deep learning-based recommender systems (DRSs) are increasingly and widely deployed in the industry, which brings significant convenience to people’s daily life in different ways. However, recommender systems are also shown to suffer from multiple issues, e.g., the echo chamber and the Matthew effect , of which the notation of “fairness” plays a core role. For instance, the system may be regarded as unfair to 1) a specific user, if the user gets worse recommendations than other users, or 2) an item (to recommend), if the item is much less likely to be exposed to the users than other items. While many fairness notations and corresponding fairness testing approaches have been developed for traditional deep classification models, they are essentially hardly applicable to DRSs. One major challenge is that there still lacks a systematic understanding and mapping between the existing fairness notations and the diverse testing requirements for deep recommender systems, not to mention further testing or debugging activities. To address the gap, we propose FairRec, a unified framework that supports fairness testing of DRSs from multiple customized perspectives, e.g., model utility, item diversity, item popularity, etc. We also propose a novel, efficient search-based testing approach to tackle the new challenge, i.e., double-ended discrete particle swarm optimization (DPSO) algorithm, to effectively search for hidden fairness issues in the form of certain disadvantaged groups from a vast number of candidate groups. Given the testing report, by adopting a simple re-ranking mitigation strategy on these identified disadvantaged groups, we show that the fairness of DRSs can be significantly improved. We conducted extensive experiments on multiple industry-level DRSs adopted by leading companies. The results confirm that FairRec is effective and efficient in identifying the deeply hidden fairness issues, e.g., achieving ∼95% testing accuracy with ∼half to 1/8 time.

Maximum Entropy Policy for Long-Term Fairness in Interactive Recommender Systems

Covering Diversification and Fairness for Better Recommendation (Short Paper).

Towards Long-term Fairness in Recommendation

FairRec: Fairness Testing for Deep Recommender Systems

Configurable Fairness for New Item Recommendation Considering Entry Time of Items

Recommendation Fairness: From Static to Dynamic

Toward Pareto Efficient Fairness-Utility Trade-off inRecommendation through Reinforcement Learning

Fair Representation Learning for Recommendation: A Mutual Information Perspective

User-Item Matching for Recommendation Fairness

Performative Debias with Fair-exposure Optimization Driven by Strategic Agents in Recommender Systems

Fairness of Exposure in Dynamic Recommendation

Causal Intervention for Fairness in Multi-behavior Recommendation

A fairness-aware multi-stakeholder recommender system

Ensuring User-side Fairness in Dynamic Recommender Systems

LTP-MMF: Towards Long-term Provider Max-min Fairness Under Recommendation Feedback Loops

Relieving Popularity Bias in Interactive Recommendation: A Diversity-Novelty-Aware Reinforcement Learning Approach

Balancing Accuracy and Fairness for Interactive Recommendation with Reinforcement Learning

Interpolating Item and User Fairness in Multi-Sided Recommendations

Distributional Fairness-aware Recommendation

Maximizing Marginal Fairness for Dynamic Learning to Rank