Enhancing medical education: youth in custody
Elizabeth Barnert,Michelle Staples-Horne,Lisa J. Chamberlain,Michael DeBaun
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41390-024-03087-6
IF: 3.953
2024-02-11
Pediatric Research
Abstract:Mass incarceration has profound adverse effects on health and is concentrated in discrete communities disproportionately living in low-income neighborhoods. Approximately 48,000 children are held each day in jails, prisons, juvenile facilities, and immigration detention facilities (referred to subsequently as custodial settings) in the United States. 1,2 Despite the large number of children held in custody, most medical students, pediatric residents, and fellows do not have direct education experience with youth in custodial settings. Without formal medical education during medical school and post-graduate pediatric training with this unique population and setting, medical students and pediatric trainees (residents, fellows) lack the full spectrum of specialty and subspecialty exposures to make career decisions. Further, many medical schools and pediatrics departments have implemented Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) positions, providing a unique opportunity to expand health equity to include children and adolescents held in custodial facilities. The 2023–2024 American Pediatric Society (APS) president's issue of the year, " Increasing Access to Quality Health Care for Youth in Custody ," calls for medical education on youth in custody as a priority focus for the field of pediatrics. 3 We outline a path for elevating and enhancing medical education on youth in custody to resolve our collective blind spot and adequately equip the next generation of pediatricians to care for youth in custody, an essential criteria for achieving health equity. To our knowledge, national curricular competencies for medical students and pediatric trainees do not include specific training requirements about the care of youth in custody. The degree of clinical exposure among United States medical schools and pediatric trainee programs to custodial settings is highly variable and unmeasured. Our collective impression based on informal surveys with department chairs, APS council, and APS members is that clinical education objectives for medical students and pediatric trainees regarding evidence-based or consensus care for children and adolescents in custody are insufficient for meeting the educational needs of medical students and pediatric trainees expected to provide medical care for this medically fragile and underserved population. While some medical student training, pediatric residency, and pediatric fellowship programs—especially adolescent medicine—provide opportunities for clinical exposure to youth or adults in carceral custody, many do not. In some academic medical centers, the adolescent fellowship programs run the youth carceral care in the local detention facilities. Although many pediatric departments and medical schools have DEI deans and vice-chairs, most academic medical centers and pediatric departments are largely disconnected and unaffiliated with the medical care of youth custodial settings. Difficulties related to jurisdictional differences in delivering health care for children in custody, permissions to enter custodial facilities, access to electronic medical records, and reimbursement models, create significant but solvable barriers impeding optimal health care for youth in custody. These challenges only become magnified when providing educational opportunities for medical students and pediatric trainees.
pediatrics