Abstract:Our knowledge of the anatomical organization of the human brain in health and disease draws heavily on the study of patients with focal brain lesions. Historically the first method of mapping brain function, it is still potentially the most powerful, establishing the necessity of any putative neural substrate for a given function or deficit. Great inferential power, however, carries a crucial vulnerability: without stronger alternatives any consistent error cannot be easily detected. A hitherto unexamined source of such error is the structure of the high-dimensional distribution of patterns of focal damage, especially in ischaemic injury-the commonest aetiology in lesion-deficit studies-where the anatomy is naturally shaped by the architecture of the vascular tree. This distribution is so complex that analysis of lesion data sets of conventional size cannot illuminate its structure, leaving us in the dark about the presence or absence of such error. To examine this crucial question we assembled the largest known set of focal brain lesions (n = 581), derived from unselected patients with acute ischaemic injury (mean age = 62.3 years, standard deviation = 17.8, male:female ratio = 0.547), visualized with diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging, and processed with validated automated lesion segmentation routines. High-dimensional analysis of this data revealed a hidden bias within the multivariate patterns of damage that will consistently distort lesion-deficit maps, displacing inferred critical regions from their true locations, in a manner opaque to replication. Quantifying the size of this mislocalization demonstrates that past lesion-deficit relationships estimated with conventional inferential methodology are likely to be significantly displaced, by a magnitude dependent on the unknown underlying lesion-deficit relationship itself. Past studies therefore cannot be retrospectively corrected, except by new knowledge that would render them redundant. Positively, we show that novel machine learning techniques employing high-dimensional inference can nonetheless accurately converge on the true locus. We conclude that current inferences about human brain function and deficits based on lesion mapping must be re-evaluated with methodology that adequately captures the high-dimensional structure of lesion data.

Deep Variational Lesion-Deficit Mapping

Human brain lesion-deficit inference remapped

Voxelwise Bayesian Lesion-Deficit Analysis.

Ground-truth validation of uni- and multivariate lesion inference approaches

Deep Variational Autoencoder for Mapping Functional Brain Networks

Brain Lesion Synthesis via Progressive Adversarial Variational Auto-Encoder

EEG-VLM Toolbox: Extending voxel-based lesion mapping to multi-dimensional EEG data

Bayesian Lesion Estimation with a Structured Spike-and-Slab Prior

Multi-Modal Latent Variables for Cross-Individual Primary Visual Cortex Modeling and Analysis

Latent Space Analysis of VAE and Intro-VAE applied to 3-dimensional MR Brain Volumes of Multiple Sclerosis, Leukoencephalopathy, and Healthy Patients

Probabilistic Inference on Virtual Brain Models of Disorders

Multi-modal Variational Autoencoders for normative modelling across multiple imaging modalities

Rethinking causality and data complexity in brain lesion-behaviour inference and its implications for lesion-behaviour modelling

Modelling the Distribution of 3D Brain MRI Using a 2D Slice VAE

Voxel-Based Bayesian Lesion-Symptom Mapping

A generalizable deep voxel-guided morphometry algorithm for the detection of subtle lesion dynamics in multiple sclerosis

Bridging Imaging and Clinical Scores in Parkinson's Progression via Multimodal Self-Supervised Deep Learning

Stable multivariate lesion symptom mapping

Normative Modeling using Multimodal Variational Autoencoders to Identify Abnormal Brain Structural Patterns in Alzheimer Disease

Lesion network mapping for neurological deficit in acute ischemic stroke

Model-based whole-brain perturbational landscape of neurodegenerative diseases